A Comparison of Model Migration Tools - Inria - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2010

A Comparison of Model Migration Tools

Résumé

Modelling languages and thus their metamodels are subject to change. When a metamodel evolves, existing models may no longer conform to the evolved metamodel. To avoid rebuilding them from scratch, existing models must be migrated to conform to the evolved metamodel. Manually migrating existing models is tedious and errorprone. To alleviate this, several tools have been proposed to build a migration strategy that automates the migration of existing models. Little is known about the advantages and disadvantages of the tools in different situations. In this paper, we thus compare a representative sample of migration tools - AML, COPE, Ecore2Ecore and Epsilon Flock - using common migration examples. The criteria used in the comparison aim to support users in selecting the most appropriate tool for their situation.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
rose-herrmannsdoerfer-williams-kolovos-garces-piage-polack_Models10.pdf (181.95 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-00499395 , version 1 (09-07-2010)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-00499395 , version 1

Citer

Louis M. Rose, Markus Herrmannsdoerfer, James R. Williams, Dimitris Kolovos, Kelly Garcés, et al.. A Comparison of Model Migration Tools. Proc. of Models 2010 Foundation Track, Oct 2010, Oslo, Norway. To appear. ⟨hal-00499395⟩
395 Consultations
858 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More