Designing Proof Formats: A User's Perspective --- Experience Report - Inria - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2011

Designing Proof Formats: A User's Perspective --- Experience Report

Résumé

Automatic provers that can produce proof certificates do not need to be trusted. The certificate can be checked by an independent tool, for example an LCF-style proof assistant such as IsabelleHOL or HOL. Currently, the design of proof formats is mostly dictated by internal constraints of automatic provers and less guided by applications such as checking of certificates. In the worst case, checking can be as involved as the actual proof search simply because important information is missing in the proof certificate. To address this and other issues, we describe design choices for proof formats that we consider both feasible for implementors of automatic provers as well as effective to simplify checking of certificates.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
paper4.pdf (68.95 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Accord explicite pour ce dépôt
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-00677244 , version 1 (07-03-2012)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-00677244 , version 1

Citer

Sascha Böhme, Tjark Weber. Designing Proof Formats: A User's Perspective --- Experience Report. First International Workshop on Proof eXchange for Theorem Proving - PxTP 2011, Aug 2011, Wrocław, Poland. ⟨hal-00677244⟩

Collections

PXTP11
119 Consultations
165 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More