Why are modalities good for Interface Theories? - Inria - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique Access content directly
Reports (Research Report) Year : 2009

Why are modalities good for Interface Theories?

Abstract

In this paper we revisit the fundamentals of interface theories. Methodological considerations call for supporting ``aspects'' and ``assume/guarantee'' reasoning. From these considerations, we show that, in addition to the now classical refinement and substitutability properties of interfaces, two additional operations are needed, namely: conjunction and residuation (or quotient). We draw the attention to the difficulty in handling interfaces having different alphabets --- which calls for alphabet equalization. We show that alphabet equalization must be performed differently for the different operations. Then, we show that Modal Interfaces, as adapted from the original proposal by Kim Larsen, offer the needed flexibility.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
RR-6899.pdf (355.97 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

inria-00375098 , version 1 (13-04-2009)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : inria-00375098 , version 1

Cite

Jean-Baptiste Raclet, Eric Badouel, Albert Benveniste, Benoit Caillaud, Roberto Passerone. Why are modalities good for Interface Theories?. [Research Report] RR-6899, INRIA. 2009. ⟨inria-00375098⟩
243 View
190 Download

Share

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More