Abstract: Divisible Load Theory (DLT) has received a lot of attention in the past decade. A divisible load is a perfect parallel task, that can be split arbitrarily and executed in parallel on a set of possibly heterogeneous resources. The success of DLT is strongly related to the existence of many optimal resource allocation and scheduling algorithms, what strongly differs from general scheduling theory. Moreover, recently, close relationships have been underlined between DLT, that provides a fruitful theoretical framework for scheduling jobs on heterogeneous platforms, and \mapreduce, that provides a simple and efficient programming framework to deploy applications on large scale distributed platforms. The success of both have suggested to extend their framework to non-linear complexity tasks. In this paper, we show that both DLT and \mapreduce are better suited to workloads with linear complexity. In particular, we prove that divisible load theory cannot directly be applied to quadratic workloads, such as it has been proposed recently. We precisely state the limits for classical DLT studies and we review and propose solutions based on a careful preparation of the dataset and clever data partitioning algorithms. In particular, through simulations, we show the possible impact of this approach on the volume of communications generated by \mapreduce, in the context of Matrix Multiplication and Outer Product algorithms.