Learning from Failure: Myths and Misguided Assumptions about IS Disciplinary Knowledge

Abstract : Many different methods have been used to understand the field of information systems, including classification, citation, and exploration of genres and lines of discourse. This paper discusses an approach based on the concept of a family of fields, where IS has greater proximity to some fields than to others.Our approach was inspired by field theory and discourse communities as a means to explain the diffusion of scientific research. The family of fields concept proved not to be viable but yielded important lessons for the study of IS and its relationship with other scientific fields. We found that (1) fields are not so easily defined, (2) borrowing of ideas across disciplines is not linear, (3) the concept of a reference discipline is obscured, and (4) we need to ask, what are the requirements for a discipline among the social sciences.
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [70 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01467798
Contributor : Hal Ifip <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 4:58:26 PM
Last modification on : Friday, December 1, 2017 - 1:16:40 AM
Long-term archiving on : Monday, May 15, 2017 - 5:54:48 PM

File

978-3-642-38862-0_31_Chapter.p...
Files produced by the author(s)

Licence


Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Identifiers

Citation

Tor Larsen, Linda Levine. Learning from Failure: Myths and Misguided Assumptions about IS Disciplinary Knowledge. InternationalWorking Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of IT (TDIT), Jun 2013, Bangalore, India. pp.495-509, ⟨10.1007/978-3-642-38862-0_31⟩. ⟨hal-01467798⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

339

Files downloads

279