From Objective to Subjective Difficulty Evaluation in Video Games

Abstract : This paper describes our research investigating the perception of difficulty in video games, defined as players’ estimation of their chances of failure. We discuss our approach as it relates to psychophysical studies of subjective difficulty and to cognitive psychology research into the overconfidence effect. The starting point for our study was the assumption that the strong motivational pull of video games may lead players to become overconfident, and thereby underestimate their chances of failure. We design and implement a method for an experiment using three games, each representing a different type of difficulty, wherein players bet on their capacity to succeed. Our results confirm the existence of a gap between players’ actual and self-evaluated chances of failure. Specifically, players seem to underestimate high levels of difficulty. The results do not show any influence on difficulty underestimation from the players gender, feelings of self-efficacy, risk aversion or gaming habits.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [60 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Hal Ifip <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, January 9, 2018 - 11:16:34 AM
Last modification on : Thursday, February 7, 2019 - 3:45:56 PM
Long-term archiving on : Wednesday, May 23, 2018 - 4:00:43 PM


 Restricted access
To satisfy the distribution rights of the publisher, the document is embargoed until : 2020-01-01

Please log in to resquest access to the document


Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License



Thomas Constant, Guillaume Levieux, Axel Buendia, Stéphane Natkin. From Objective to Subjective Difficulty Evaluation in Video Games. 16th IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT), Sep 2017, Bombay, India. pp.107-127, ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-67684-5_8⟩. ⟨hal-01678476⟩



Record views