Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

Citizens’ Evaluation of an Online Argument Visualisation Platform for eParticipation

Abstract : Argument visualisation (AV) tools facilitate structured debates utilising elements such as issues, positions and arguments. In this way, AV tools seem promising for improving eParticipation e.g. by avoiding repetition and enhancing clarity in debates. In this paper we present and discuss citizens’ opinion on utilising an AV platform for eParticipation, specifically for discussing the emerging topic of environment and climate change. Results have been interesting; most users found the platform and topic interesting and understandable stating that they would use the platform again in the future and recommend it to other people. However, negative feedback has also been received, mostly in relation to things that frustrated users (e.g. the logic behind AV) and suggestions for improvement. As our evaluation is based on a mature AV tool and focuses on general aspects of such tools, we believe that results may be applicable to other AV platforms as well.
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [11 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01541480
Contributor : Hal Ifip <>
Submitted on : Monday, June 19, 2017 - 11:02:39 AM
Last modification on : Monday, July 30, 2018 - 12:02:02 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Friday, December 15, 2017 - 4:36:19 PM

File

978-3-642-33250-0_5_Chapter.pd...
Files produced by the author(s)

Licence


Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Identifiers

Citation

Eleni Panopoulou, Efpraxia Dalakiouridou, Efthimios Tambouris, Konstantinos Tarabanis. Citizens’ Evaluation of an Online Argument Visualisation Platform for eParticipation. 4th International Conference on Electronic Participation (ePart), Sep 2012, Kristiansand, Norway. pp.49-60, ⟨10.1007/978-3-642-33250-0_5⟩. ⟨hal-01541480⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

117

Files downloads

227