J. Boutahar, S. Lacour, V. Mallet, D. Quélo, Y. Roustan et al., Development and validation of a fully modular platform for numerical modelling of air pollution: POLAIR, International Journal of Environment and Pollution, vol.22, issue.1/2, pp.17-28, 2004.
DOI : 10.1504/IJEP.2004.005474
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00527198

P. Builtjes, The LOTOS ? Long Term Ozone Simulation ? project, summary report, Neth. Organ. for Appl. Sci. Res. TNO, 1992.

R. Buizza, M. Miller, and T. N. Palmer, Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol.8, issue.560, pp.2887-2908, 1999.
DOI : 10.1002/qj.49712556006

D. W. Byun and J. , Science algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system, EPA, Off. of Res. and Dev., U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency, vol.600, 1999.

J. Chang, R. Brost, I. Isaken, S. Madronich, P. Middleton et al., A three-dimensional Eulerian acid deposition model: Physical concepts and formulation, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol.21, issue.62, pp.681-14700, 1987.
DOI : 10.1029/JD092iD12p14681

J. H. Christensen, The Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model, Atmos. Environ, vol.31, pp.4169-4191, 1997.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4615-5841-5_27
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00301141

L. Delle-monache and R. B. Stull, An ensemble air-quality forecast over western Europe during an ozone episode, Atmospheric Environment, vol.37, issue.25, pp.3469-3474, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00475-8

E. ´-tude, simulation de la qualitéd el ' a i re n ^ Ile-de-France (ESQUIF) Project (2001), E ´ tude et simulation de la qualité de l'air en ^ Ile de France, rapport final

S. Galmarini, Ensemble dispersion forecasting???Part I: concept, approach and indicators, Atmospheric Environment, vol.38, issue.28, pp.4607-4617, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.030
URL : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.030

C. W. Gardiner, Handbook of Stochastic Methods: For Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences, 1996.

A. Gross and W. R. Stockwell, Comparison of the EMEP, RADM2 and RACM mechanisms, Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, vol.44, issue.2, pp.151-170, 2003.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1022483412112

S. R. Hanna, Z. Lu, H. C. Frey, N. Wheeler, J. Vukovich et al., Uncertainties in predicted ozone concentrations due to input uncertainties for the UAM-V photochemical grid model applied to the July 1995 OTAG domain, Atmospheric Environment, vol.35, issue.5, pp.891-903, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00367-8

H. Hass, Description of the EURAD chemistry-transport-model version 2 (CTM2), Inst. of Geophys. and Meteorol, 1991.

H. Hass, P. J. Builtjes, D. Simpson, and R. Stern, Comparison of model results obtained with several european regional air quality models, Atmospheric Environment, vol.31, issue.19, pp.3259-3279, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00066-6

L. W. Horowitz, A global simulation of tropospheric ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol.56, issue.D4, pp.478410-1029, 2003.
DOI : 10.1029/2002JD002853

P. L. Houtemaker, L. Lefaivre, J. Derome, H. Ritchie, and H. L. Mitchell, A system simulation approach to ensemble prediction, Mon. Weather Rev, vol.124, issue.6, pp.1225-1242, 1996.

J. Louis, A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol.93, issue.2, pp.187-202, 1979.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00117978

S. Madronich, Photodissociation in the atmosphere: 1. Actinic flux and the effects of ground reflections and clouds, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol.59, issue.D8, pp.9740-9752, 1987.
DOI : 10.1029/JD092iD08p09740

V. Mallet and B. Sportisse, 3-D chemistry-transport model Polair: numerical issues, validation and automatic-differentiation strategy, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, vol.4, issue.2, pp.1371-1392, 2004.
DOI : 10.5194/acpd-4-1371-2004
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00327858

V. Mallet and B. Sportisse, Data processing and parameterizations in atmospheric chemistry and physics: The AtmoData library, Tech. Rep, vol.12, 2005.

V. Mallet, D. Quélo, and B. Sportisse, Software architecture of an ideal modeling platform in air quality ? A first step: Polyphemus, 2005.

P. Middleton, W. R. Stockwell, and W. P. Carter, Aggregation and analysis of volatile organic compound emissions for regional modeling, Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics, vol.24, issue.5, pp.1107-1133, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0960-1686(90)90077-Z

K. Nodop, ETEX Symposium on Long-Range Atmospheric Transport, Model Verification and Emergency Response, 1997.

N. R. Passant, Speciation of UK emissions of NMVOC, AEA Technol, 2002.

A. Russell and R. Dennis, NARSTO critical review of photochemical models and modeling, Atmospheric Environment, vol.34, issue.12-14, pp.2283-2324, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00468-9

H. Schmidt, Sensitivity studies with the adjoint of a chemistry transport model for the boundary layer, in Air Pollution Modelling and Simulation, pp.400-410, 2002.

H. Schmidt, C. Derognat, R. Vautard, and M. Beekmann, A comparison of simulated and observed ozone mixing ratios for the summer of 1998 in Western Europe, Atmospheric Environment, vol.35, issue.36, pp.6277-6297, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00451-4

D. Simpson, Inventorying emissions from nature in Europe, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol.4, issue.1, pp.8113-8152, 1999.
DOI : 10.1029/98JD02747

D. Simpson, H. Fagerli, J. E. Jonson, S. Tsyro, P. Wind et al., Transboundary acidification, eutrophication and ground level ozone in Europe: Part I. Unified EMEP model description, Eur. Monit. and Eval. Programme, issue.1, 2003.

B. Sportisse, An Analysis of Operator Splitting Techniques in the Stiff Case, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.161, issue.1, pp.140-168, 2000.
DOI : 10.1006/jcph.2000.6495
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00532739

W. R. Stockwell, P. Middleton, J. S. Chang, and X. Tang, The second generation regional acid deposition model chemical mechanism for regional air quality modeling, Journal of Geophysical Research, vol.18, issue.D10, pp.95343-95359, 1990.
DOI : 10.1029/JD095iD10p16343

W. R. Stockwell, F. Kirchner, M. Kuhn, and S. Seefeld, A new mechanism for regional atmospheric chemistry modeling, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol.25, issue.D22, pp.847-872, 1997.
DOI : 10.1029/97JD00849

Z. Tao, S. M. Larson, A. Williams, M. Caughey, and D. J. Wuebbles, Sensitivity of regional ozone concentrations to temporal distribution of emissions, Atmospheric Environment, vol.38, issue.37, pp.6279-6285, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.042

Z. Toth and E. Kalnay, Ensemble Forecasting at NMC: The Generation of Perturbations, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol.74, issue.12, pp.2317-2330, 1993.
DOI : 10.1175/1520-0477(1993)074<2317:EFANTG>2.0.CO;2

I. Troen and L. Mahrt, A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer; sensitivity to surface evaporation, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol.105, issue.1-2, pp.129-148, 1986.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00122760

T. T. Warner, R. Sheu, J. F. Bowers, R. I. Sykes, G. C. Dodd et al., Ensemble Simulations with Coupled Atmospheric Dynamic and Dispersion Models: Illustrating Uncertainties in Dosage Simulations, Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol.41, issue.5, pp.488-504, 2002.
DOI : 10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<0488:ESWCAD>2.0.CO;2

M. L. Wesely, Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models, Atmospheric Environment (1967), vol.23, issue.6, pp.1293-1304, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4

L. Zhang, J. R. Brook, and R. Vet, A revised parameterization for gaseous dry deposition in air-quality models, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol.3, issue.6, pp.2067-2082, 2003.
DOI : 10.5194/acp-3-2067-2003
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00295366