Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Architecture Quality Revisited

Abstract : There is a common belief in the software community that nonfunctional quality is fundamentally important for architecture sustainability and project success. A recent study, however, suggests that nonfunctional quality is of little relevance for users and customers, but instead mainly a concern for architects. Nontechnical constraints, such as licenses and technology providers, appear to be driving design as prominently as quality requirements. Quality requirements, such as performance, are mainly defined by architects on the basis of their experiences, and are often poorly documented and validated. This column explores whether the software community actually overestimates the relevance of nonfunctional qualities or whether the study's observations indicate a valid position on nonfunctional quality for certain types of application domains, development approaches, and organizational setups.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Jordi Cabot Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Monday, September 24, 2012 - 1:23:54 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, April 27, 2022 - 4:22:54 AM


  • HAL Id : hal-00734712, version 1


Claudia Ayala, Xavier Franch, David Ameller, Jordi Cabot, Frank Buschmann. Architecture Quality Revisited. IEEE Software, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2012, 29 (4), pp.22-24. ⟨hal-00734712⟩



Record views