. La-puissance-est-maintenue-À-60%pn, « forçage à 60% »).en attendant que la seconde TPA soit réparée, puis on remonte en charge. Le temps d'attente de la seconde TPA est trop court

. Nous-présentons-ici-le-calcul-de-la-probabilité-d, AAR causé par le système élémentaire TPA lorsque la puissance est entre 0% et 60% Pn (un seul AAR à cause de TPA est possible dans ce cas) Nous nous appuyons sur la figure 5.13 pour illustration

L. Aar-résulte-de-la-trajectoire-suivante, le TPA1 démarre, la montée en puissance est effectuée, lorsque la puissance atteint 60% la TPA2 est démarrée, si elle ne démarre pas la puissance reste à 60% assurée par la TPA1 jusqu'à ce que la TPA2 ne soit pas réparée

L. Probabilité-de-démarrage-de-la, T. De, and 9. , Si la TPA1 tombe en panne pendant la montée en puissance jusqu'à 60%, le système est forcé à 2%, cela ne provoque pas d'AAR. Une fois la puissance à 60%, la TPA2 est démarrée avec la probabilité d'échec de démarrage de 9,3.10 -4 (soit la partie hors turbine ne démarre pas, soit la partie hors turbine démarre et la partie turbine ne démarre pas)

. Aucune-dégradation, telle que la valeur mesurée du niveau d'eau Ngem soit toujours égale à Nge. Pour chaque intervalle de temps [t,t + ?t), toutes les variables sont mises à jour à l'aide de réseaux de Petri dédiés. Cette mise à jour se fait suivant un ordre spécifique respectant la dynamique de fonctionnement du système

G. Modélisations-du, I. E. Miossec-c, and T. J. , « Towards efficient full automatic operation of the PWR steam generator with water level adaptive control, Proceedings of the International Conference on Boiler Dynamics and Control in Nuclear Power Stations, pp.309-329, 1980.

A. Bell-r.-d, P. A. Parry, and . J. Vivier-m, « Drum Boiler dynamics Recent progress in SG level control in French PWR plants, Proceedings of the International Conference on Boiler Dynamics and Control in Nuclear Power Stations [FAL 99] BENDOTTI P., FALINOWER C.M., EDF Benchmark for robust control techniques evaluations of proposed solutions 14th world congress IFAC, pp.363-378, 1999.

K. M. Mettler-b, . Morari-m, . Bendotti-p, K. M. Falinower-c, . Mettler-b et al., Level control in the steam generator of a nuclear power plant. Decision and control, Proceedings of the 35th IEEE Level Control in the Steam Generator of a Nuclear Power Plant, M.V. Kothare et al. 35th IEEE transactions in Decision and Control, pp.4851-4856, 1996.

R. M. Ait, . P. Folcherf-j, . L. El, . Bendotti-p, and . M. Falinower-c, Control of jump linear systems : Application to the steam generator water level, Proceedings of the 38" Conference on Decision & Control Phoenix, 1999.

. Régulations, Mitter A unified framework for hybrid control: model and optimal control theory, IEEE transactions on automatic control, vol.43, issue.1, pp.31-45, 1998.

C. F. Brissaud, . Barros-a, and . Bérenguer-c, Reliability analysis for new technology-based transmitters, Reliability Engineering and System Safety february 2011, pp.299-313
DOI : 10.1016/j.ress.2010.09.010

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00553009

J. Thomas, D. Dumur, J. Buisson, . Bendotti-p, and . M. Falinower-c, Moving horizon sate estimation of hybrid systems. Application to faut detection of sensors of a steam generator, 2003.

. Optimisation, P. Busacca, M. Marseguerra, and E. Zio, Multiobjective optimization by genetic algorithms: application to safety systems, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol.72, pp.59-74, 2001.

J. Kirschenbaum, M. Stovsky, P. Bucci, T. Aldemir, and S. A. Arndt, Benchmark development for comparing digital instrumentation and control system reliability modeling approaches, 2005.

S. A. Arndt, A benchmark system for the reliability modeling of digital instrumentation and control systems , International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and management Conference PSAM 9, Hong Kong [NUR 07a] NUREG/CR-6942, Dynamic Reliability Modeling of Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems for Nuclear Reactor Probabilistic Risk Assessments, NUR 06] NUREG/CR-6901, Current State of Reliability Modeling Methodologies for Digital Systems and Their Acceptance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plant Assessments, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2006.

I. E. Miossec-c and T. J. , « Towards efficient full automatic operation of the PWR steam generator with water level adaptive control, Proceedings of the International Conference on Boiler Dynamics and Control in Nuclear Power Stations, pp.309-329, 1980.

. Thuy, R. Torok, P. N. Epri-report, G. Thuy, and . Deleuze, Against Digital Common-Cause Failure- Combining Defensive Measures and Diversity Attributes, Modélisation des interactions type II [EPRI 10 Sixth American Nuclear Society International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies, 2009.

]. G. Deleuze, R. Quatrain, F. Jouanet, and N. Thuy, Experimentation of sensitivity study based on Beta Factors to assess the impact of I&C in PSA, 2010.

G. Deleuze, R. Quatrain, F. Jouanet, N. G. Thuy, R. Deleuze et al., Assessment of common cause failures and defensive measures for the representation of I&C in probabilistic models, 2011.
DOI : 10.1201/b11433-181

C. P. , R. J. , L. J. Deleuze-g, . Bouissou-m, R. Y. Chaux-p et al., Qualitative analysis of a BDMP by Finite Automaton Towards a unified definition of Minimal Cut Sequences for dynamic repairable systems, SAFECOMP, vol.2012

T. Aldemir, Utilization of the Cell-To-Cell Mapping Technique to Construct MarkovFailure Models for Process Control Systems, Cell to Cell Mapping Technique (CCMT) [ALD 91] Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management: PSAM1, pp.1431-1436, 1991.

C. Garrett, S. Guarro, and G. Apostolakis, The dynamic flowgraph methodology for assessing the dependability of embedded software systems, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol.25, issue.5, pp.824-840, 1995.
DOI : 10.1109/21.376495

M. Yau, S. Guarro, and G. Apostolakis, Demonstration of the Dynamic Flowgraph Methodology using the Titan II Space Launch Vehicle Digital Flight Control System, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.49, issue.3, pp.335-353, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00050-C

P. Y. Chaux and G. Deleuze, Comparaison de deux méthodes dynamiques d'évaluation de la sureté de fonctionnement :BDMP et DFM, Congrès Lambda Mu, 2010.

D. R. Modélisation-par-réseaux-de-petri-stochastiques and A. H. , « Petri nets for modeling of dynamic systems, A survey Automatica, vol.30, issue.2, pp.175-202, 1994.

T. Murata, Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications, Proceedings of the IEEE, pp.541-580, 1989.
DOI : 10.1109/5.24143

Z. V. Bérenguer-c, G. A. , D. A. , and L. J. , « Multi-component systems modeling for quantifying complex maintenance strategies, Proc. Of European Safety & Reliability Conference '08, pp.3586-3591, 2008.

B. G. Brînzei-n, A. J. Pérez, and C. , « Reliability assessment for complex systems operating in dynamic environment, Modélisation par Automates Stochastiques Hybrides Annual Conference of the European Safety and Reliability Association, 2011.

J. K. Kristensen-l, Coloured Petri Nets: modeling and validation of concurrent systems, 2009.

P. Castañeda and G. A. , Évaluation par simulation de la sûreté de fonctionnement de systèmes en contexte dynamique hybride, Thèse de doctorat de l'Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine, 2009.

P. Castañeda, G. A. , and A. J. Brînzei-n, Performance assessment of systems including conflict in the context of dynamic reliability, International Journal of Adaptive and Innovative Systems, vol.1, issue.3/4, pp.3-4, 2010.
DOI : 10.1504/IJAIS.2010.034802

P. Castañeda, G. A. , and A. J. Brînzei-n, Stochastic hybrid automata model for dynamic reliability assessment, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, pp.28-41, 2011.
DOI : 10.1177/1748006XJRR312

P. M. Belhadaoui-h and W. W. Malassé-o, « Efficient generation and representation of failure lists out of an information flow model for modelling safety critical systems, Annual Conference of the European Safety and Reliability Association, 2008.

P. Castañeda, G. A. Aubry, J. F. Brinzei, and N. , Stochastic hybrid automata model for dynamic reliability assessment, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and ReliabilityDynamic Reliability andAssessment) », International Workshop on Dynamic Aspects in Dependability Models for Fault- Tolerant Systems, DYADEM-FTS 2010 in conjunction with European Dependable Computing Conference EDCC 2010, pp.28-41, 2010.
DOI : 10.1177/1748006XJRR312

D. M. Dufour-f, Markov models and optimization, Modélisation par Processus Markoviens Déterministes par Morceaux Dynamic Reliability : a new model », -13 et ESREL02, pp.350-353, 1993.

B. De-saporta, F. Dufour, and K. Gonzalez, Numerical method for optimal stopping of hybrid processes, 3rd IFAC Conference on Analysis and Design of Hybrid Systems, 2009.

D. Saporta, B. Dufour-f, «. Gonzalez-k, . B. De, . Dufour-f et al., Numerical method for optimal stopping of piecewise deterministic Markov processes, The Annals of Applied Probability, vol.20, issue.5, pp.1607-1637, 2010.
DOI : 10.1214/09-AAP667

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00367964

B. De-saporta, F. Dufour, and H. Zhang, Approximation of the value function of an impulse control problem of Piecewise deterministic Markov process, IFAC 18th world congress, 2011.

H. Zhang, B. De-saporta, F. Dufour, G. Deleuze, . Dynamic et al., Predictive maintenance for the heated hold-up tank Numerical method for expectations of piecewisedetermistic Markov processes Numerical method for impulse control of Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processes Numerical methods for the exit time of a piecewise-deterministic Markov process Optimal stopping for the predictive maintenance of a structure subject to corrosion, 8th International Conference on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies Dynamic Bayesian Networks for Assessing Reliability of Hybrid Systems Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Mathematical Methods in Reliability : Theory, Methods, pp.2012-2012, 2011.

L. Duy, D. Vasseur, M. Couplet, L. Dieulle, and C. Bérenguer, Parameter and Model Uncertainty Analysis using Dempster-Shafer Theory in Nuclear Probabilistic Risk Assessment, Proceedings of the International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis -PSA 2011 - ?µ ?µ, 2011.

F. Brissaud, C. Smidts, A. Barros, and C. Bérenguer, Dynamic Reliability Modeling of Cooperating Digital-Based Systems, in Reliability, Risk and Safety -Back to the future -Proc. of the European Safety and Reliability Conference -ESREL, pp.2010-978, 2010.

C. Duflot, L. Bérenguer, D. Dieulle, and . Vasseur, On the independence of defense lines of a new nuclear power plant, in Risk, reliability and Societal Safety -Proc. of European Safety and Reliability Conference -ESREL, 2007.

C. Duflot, L. Bérenguer, D. Dieulle, and . Vasseur, A min cut-set-wise truncation procedure for importance measures computation in probabilistic safety assessment, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, pp.1827-1837, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ress.2009.05.015

A. Langeron, A. Barros, C. Grall, and . Bérenguer, Dependability assessment of networkbased safetyrelated system, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, pp.622-631, 2011.

C. Zille, A. Bérenguer, A. Grall, and . Despujols, Modelling multi-component systems to quantify RCM maintenance strategies, Journal of Risk and Reliability -Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, pp.2011-141
DOI : 10.1177/1748006x11402269

R. Ghostine, J. M. Thiriet, and J. F. Aubry, Variable delays and message losses: Influence on the reliability of a control loop, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.96, issue.1, pp.160-171, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ress.2010.08.003

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00534346

G. Morel, J. F. Pétin, and T. Johnson, Reliability, maintenance, and safety, pp.535-547, 2009.

M. Sallak, C. Simon, and J. F. Aubry, A Fuzzy Probabilistic Approach for Determining Safety Integrity Level, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol.16, issue.1, pp.239-248, 2008.
DOI : 10.1109/TFUZZ.2007.903328

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00167486

J. F. Pétin, D. Gouyon, and G. Morel, Supervisory synthesis for product-driven automation and its application to a flexible assembly cell, Control Engineering Practice, vol.15, issue.5, pp.595-614, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.conengprac.2006.10.013

R. Schoenig, J. F. Aubry, T. Cambois, and T. Hutinet, An aggregation method of Markov graphs for the reliability analysis of hybrid systems, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.91, issue.2, pp.137-148, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ress.2005.03.007

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00125728

J. 1. Pétin, F. Morel, G. Panetto, and H. , Formal Specification Method for Systems Automation, European Journal of Control, vol.12, issue.2, pp.115-130, 2006.
DOI : 10.3166/ejc.12.115-130

G. Babykina, N. Brinzei, J. F. Aubry, and G. A. Perez-castaneda, Reliability assessment for complex systems operating in dynamic environment, Annual Conference of the European Safety and Reliability Association, 2011.
DOI : 10.1201/b11433-48

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00626198

T. Lemattre, B. Denis, J. M. Faure, J. F. Pétin, and P. Salaün, Designing operational control architectures of critical systems by reachability analysis, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/CASE.2011.6042413

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00612273

G. Habib, J. F. Pétin, and T. Divoux, Dynamic adaptation of IEEE 802.11e priorities for improving temporal performance and safety of a Wireless Networked Discrete Control system, 2011 3rd International Workshop on Dependable Control of Discrete Systems, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/DCDS.2011.5970333

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00605494

J. F. Pétin, D. Evrot, G. Morel, and P. Lamy, Combining SysML and formal methods for safety requirements verification, 22nd International Conference on Software & Systems Engineering and their Applications, 2010.

H. Belhadaoui, M. Jallouli, C. Diou, F. Monteiro, O. Malassé et al., Evaluation of important reliability parameters using VHDL-RTL modelling and information flow approach, European Safety and Reliability Conference ESREL, pp.2549-2557, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00340667

R. De and P. Non, Non RdPS Cf 1.5. Non Pert

O. Arbres-de-défaillance-dynamique, O. Diagram, and . Non, OK OK Non Go Flow OK ? OK ? Non ? ? ? OK OK OK Approches Bayésiennes d'estimation de la fiabilité OK ? ? ? Non Non ? ? ? ? OK Approches par Tests ? ? OK Non OK ? OK OK ? Non OK Approches basées sur les métriques logicielles Non ? Non Non ? ?