Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
New interface
Journal articles

Ce qu'il y a de bien (ou de mal) dans l'évaluation bibliométrique telle que pratiquée par l'AERES

Nicolas Holzschuch 1 
1 ARTIS - Acquisition, representation and transformations for image synthesis
Inria Grenoble - Rhône-Alpes, LJK - Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology
Abstract : The French higher education and research evaluation body (AERES, Agence d'évaluation de la recherche et de l'enseignement supérieur) was set up to carry out evaluations in the French university system. One of the key criteria used by AERES experts is the number of publications per researcher. Nicolas Holzschuch has studied the pros and cons of this method of evaluation. Some aspects of the method have proved controversial, including the way articles are counted depending on the field of research and the creation of lists of journals by categories of prestige. However, implementing the evaluation process has made researchers focus more on publication, which has had a positive impact on research.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Nicolas Holzschuch Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, October 24, 2012 - 12:37:30 PM
Last modification on : Friday, February 4, 2022 - 3:31:50 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Friday, January 25, 2013 - 3:43:53 AM


Publisher files allowed on an open archive


  • HAL Id : hal-00744978, version 1



Nicolas Holzschuch. Ce qu'il y a de bien (ou de mal) dans l'évaluation bibliométrique telle que pratiquée par l'AERES. Bulletin des bibliothèques de France, 2010, 55 (4), pp.52-55. ⟨hal-00744978⟩



Record views


Files downloads