Ce qu'il y a de bien (ou de mal) dans l'évaluation bibliométrique telle que pratiquée par l'AERES

Nicolas Holzschuch 1
1 ARTIS - Acquisition, representation and transformations for image synthesis
Inria Grenoble - Rhône-Alpes, LJK - Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, INPG - Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble
Abstract : The French higher education and research evaluation body (AERES, Agence d'évaluation de la recherche et de l'enseignement supérieur) was set up to carry out evaluations in the French university system. One of the key criteria used by AERES experts is the number of publications per researcher. Nicolas Holzschuch has studied the pros and cons of this method of evaluation. Some aspects of the method have proved controversial, including the way articles are counted depending on the field of research and the creation of lists of journals by categories of prestige. However, implementing the evaluation process has made researchers focus more on publication, which has had a positive impact on research.
Document type :
Journal articles
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00744978
Contributor : Nicolas Holzschuch <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, October 24, 2012 - 12:37:30 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, April 11, 2018 - 1:57:53 AM
Document(s) archivé(s) le : Friday, January 25, 2013 - 3:43:53 AM

File

4_bbf-2010-04-0052-015.pdf
Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-00744978, version 1

Collections

Citation

Nicolas Holzschuch. Ce qu'il y a de bien (ou de mal) dans l'évaluation bibliométrique telle que pratiquée par l'AERES. Bulletin des bibliothèques de France, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences de l'Information et des Bibliothèques (ENSSIB), 2010, 55 (4), pp.52-55. ⟨http://bbf.enssib.fr/consulter/bbf-2010-04-0052-015⟩. ⟨hal-00744978⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

419

Files downloads

163