Argumentation over Ontology Correspondences in MAS - Inria - Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2007

Argumentation over Ontology Correspondences in MAS

Résumé

In order to support semantic interoperation in open environments, where agents can dynamically join or leave and no prior assumption can be made on the ontologies to align, the different agents involved need to agree on the semantics of the terms used during the interoperation. Reaching this agreement can only come through some sort of negotiation process. Indeed, agents will differ in the domain ontologies they commit to; and their perception of the world, and hence the choice of vocabulary used to represent concepts. We propose an approach for supporting the creation and exchange of different arguments, that support or reject possible correspondences. Each agent can decide, according to its preferences, whether to accept or refuse a candidate correspondence. The proposed framework considers arguments and propositions that are specific to the matching task and are based on the ontology semantics. This argumentation framework relies on a formal argument manipulation schema and on an encoding of the agents' preferences between particular kinds of arguments.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
laera2007a.pdf (579.95 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-00817813 , version 1 (25-04-2013)

Identifiants

Citer

Loredana Laera, Ian Blacoe, Valentina Tamma, Terry Payne, Jérôme Euzenat, et al.. Argumentation over Ontology Correspondences in MAS. Proc. 6th International conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), May 2007, Honolulu, United States. pp.1285-1292, ⟨10.1145/1329125.1329400⟩. ⟨hal-00817813⟩
275 Consultations
253 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More