Modeling Time(s), 10th Int. Conf. on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS '07), ser, pp.559-573, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-75209-7_38
Syntax and semantics of the Clock Constraint Specification Language (CCSL), INRIA, Research Report, vol.6925, 2009. ,
Pattern-Driven Support for Designing Component-Based Architectural Models, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, pp.187-196, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1109/ECBS.2011.20
Logical Time and Temporal Logics: Comparing UML MARTE/CCSL and PSL, 2011 Eighteenth International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning, pp.141-148, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1109/TIME.2011.10
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00540738
Verification of MARTE/CCSL Time Requirements in Promela/SPIN, 2011 16th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, pp.65-74, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1109/ICECCS.2011.14
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00650621
Boundness Issues in CCSL Specifications, ICFEM, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-41202-8_3
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00877598
The synchronous languages 12 years later, Proc. of the IEEE, pp.64-83, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1109/JPROC.2002.805826
Polychrony for system design, Journal of Circuits, Systems, and Computers, vol.12, issue.3, pp.261-304, 2003. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00730480
A framework for comparing models of computation, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol.17, issue.12, pp.1217-1229, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1109/43.736561
State-based representation of CCSL operators, 2013. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00846684
Marked directed graphs, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol.5, issue.5, pp.511-523, 1971. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-0000(71)80013-2
Probì eme d'ordonnancement: modélisation, complexité, algorithmes, 1988. ,
Depth-First Search and Linear Graph Algorithms, SIAM Journal on Computing, vol.1, issue.2, p.146160, 1972. ,
DOI : 10.1137/0201010
Flow latency analysis with the architecture analysis and design language, 2007. ,
Polychronous controller synthesis from MARTE CCSL timing specifications, Ninth ACM/IEEE International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for Codesign (MEMPCODE2011), pp.21-30, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1109/MEMCOD.2011.5970507
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00594942
Lazy parallel synchronous composition of infinite transition systems, ICTERI, ser. CEUR Workshop Proc, pp.130-145, 2013. ,
Times: A tool for schedulability analysis and code generation of real-time systems, " in Formal Modeling and Analysis of Timed Systems, ser, LNCS, vol.2791, pp.60-72, 2004. ,
Decidable and undecidable problems in schedulability analysis using timed automata, " in Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, ser, LNCS, vol.2988, pp.236-250, 2004. ,
Scheduling with timed automata, Theoretical Computer Science, vol.354, issue.2, pp.272-300, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.tcs.2005.11.018
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00157338
A theory of timed automata, Theoretical Computer Science, vol.126, issue.2, pp.183-235, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0304-3975(94)90010-8
Regular Specifications of Resource Requirements for Embedded Control Software, 2008 IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium, pp.159-168, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1109/RTAS.2008.13
Static Scheduling of Synchronous Data Flow Programs for Digital Signal Processing, APPENDIX PROOFS Proof of Proposition 21: By recursion on ? ?, pp.24-35, 1987. ,
DOI : 10.1109/TC.1987.5009446
=? (c 1 ? ?(n) ? c 2 ? ?(n)) =? u ? ?(n)) =? ? |= ccsl c 1 ? un)) =? ? |= ccsl c 2 ? u. Proof of Proposition 24: Let us assume ? |= ccsl i c 1 * c 2 . (i ? ?(n) =? (c 1 ? ?(n) ? c 2 ? ?(n)) =? c 1 ? ?(n)) =? ? |= ccsl i ? c 1 . (i ? ?(n) =? (c 1 ? ?(n) ? c 2 ? ?(n)) =? c 2 ? ?(n)) =? ? |= ccsl i ? c 2 . Proof of Proposition 26: Let us assume ? |= ccsl inf c 1 ? c 2 . (? ? (inf, n) = max(? ? (c 1 , n), ? ? (c2 , n)) =? ? ? (inf, n) ? ? ? (c 1 , n)) =? ? |= ccsl inf c 1 . Similarly, ? ? (inf, n) ? ? ?, Proof of Proposition =? ? |= ccsl inf c 2 . Proof of Proposition 27: Let us assume ? |= ccsl sup c 1 ? c 2 . (? ? (sup, n) = min(? ? (c 1 , n), ? ? (c2 , n)) =? ? ? (c 1 , n) ? ? ? (sup, n)) =? ? |= ccsl c 1 sup. Similarly, ? ? (c 2 , n) ? ? ? (sup, n)) =? ? |= ccsl c 2 sup ,