Evaluating ontology alignment methods

Abstract : Many different methods have been designed for aligning ontologies. These methods use such different techniques that they can hardly be compared theoretically. Hence, it is necessary to compare them on common tests. We present two initiatives that led to the definition and the performance of the evaluation of ontology alignments during 2004. We draw lessons from these two experiments and discuss future improvements.
Document type :
Conference papers
Liste complète des métadonnées

Cited literature [7 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00922281
Contributor : Jérôme Euzenat <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, December 25, 2013 - 8:00:14 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, April 4, 2019 - 5:18:02 PM
Document(s) archivé(s) le : Tuesday, March 25, 2014 - 10:12:01 PM

File

euzenat2004i.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-00922281, version 1

Collections

Citation

Jérôme Euzenat. Evaluating ontology alignment methods. Proc. Dagstuhl seminar on Semantic interoperability and integration, Sep 2004, Wadern, Germany. No pagination., 2005, Proc. Dagstuhl seminar on Semantic interoperability and integration. 〈hal-00922281〉

Share

Metrics

Record views

383

Files downloads

165