Probing for Loss: The Case Against Probe Trains.

Abstract : We assess the bias and variance of active probing measurement techniques for loss in networks. We show that loss probability is best measured using isolated probes rather than with probe 'trains', which contrasts with prior work which found that probe trains better estimate statistics of lossy periods.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
IEEE Communications Letters, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2011, 15 (5), pp.590-592. 〈http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=05738312〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00940542
Contributeur : Fabien Mathieu <>
Soumis le : samedi 1 février 2014 - 18:44:40
Dernière modification le : vendredi 31 août 2018 - 09:12:06

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-00940542, version 1

Collections

Citation

François Baccelli, Sridhar Machiraju, Darryl Veitch, Jean Bolot. Probing for Loss: The Case Against Probe Trains.. IEEE Communications Letters, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2011, 15 (5), pp.590-592. 〈http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=05738312〉. 〈hal-00940542〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

303