Majority Judgment: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.7551/mitpress/9780262015134.001.0001
The theory of committees and elections, 1958. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-009-4225-7
Social Choice Observed: Five Presidential Elections of the American Psychological Association, The Journal of Politics, vol.46, issue.2, pp.479-502, 1984. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2130971
Manipulability of voting systems, 2012. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00692096
Making most voting systems meet the condorcet criterion reduces their ma- nipulability ,
Some Further Results on the Manipulability of Social Choice Rules, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.16, issue.3, pp.485-509, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-006-0106-2
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00068839
Borda rule, Copeland method and strategic manipulation, Review of Economic Design, vol.7, issue.2, pp.213-228, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s100580200073
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00069522
Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result, Econometrica, vol.41, issue.4, pp.587-601, 1973. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1914083
Four condorcet-hare hybrid methods for single-winner elections. Voting matters, pp.1-14, 2011. ,
Strategic voting and nomination. Social Choice and Welfare, pp.111-138, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-013-0725-3
Statistical evaluation of voting rules, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.21, issue.954, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-015-0909-0
The proportion of coalitionally unstable situations under the plurality rule, Economics Letters, vol.24, issue.4, pp.311-315, 1987. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0165-1765(87)90062-0
The vulnerability of four social choice functions to coalitional manipulation of preferences, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.11, issue.3, pp.253-265, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF00193810
On the Kim and Roush voting procedure. Group Decision and Negotiation, pp.109-123, 1999. ,
Voting rules, manipulability and social homogeneity, Public Choice, vol.116, issue.1/2, pp.165-184, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1024221816507
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00069239
On Ehrhart polynomials and probability calculations in voting theory, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.25, issue.6, pp.363-383, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-007-0236-1
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01245310
La Stratégie du vote. Cahiers du CEREMADE, 1978. ,
Exact results on manipulability of positional voting rules, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.16, issue.4, pp.487-513, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-007-0216-5
Susceptibility to manipulation, Public Choice, vol.64, issue.1, pp.21-41, 1990. ,
Strategy-proofness and arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.10, issue.2, pp.187-217, 1975. ,
How large should a coalition be to manipulate an election?, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.47, issue.3, pp.289-293, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2003.09.007
Manipulability measures of common social choice functions, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.16, issue.4, pp.639-661, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s003550050166
Collective Decisions And Voting: The Potential for Public Choice ,