https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01011420Pimentel, ElaineElainePimentelUFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais [Belo Horizonte]Olarte, CarlosCarlosOlarteDepartamento de ElectrÃ³nica, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ - Pontificia Universidad JaverianaNigam, VivekVivekNigamA Proof Theoretic Study of Soft Concurrent Constraint ProgrammingHAL CCSD2014Soft Constraintslinear logicconcurrent constraint programming[INFO.INFO-LO] Computer Science [cs]/Logic in Computer Science [cs.LO]Palamidessi, Catuscia2014-06-23 19:19:172022-09-02 09:42:102014-06-23 19:19:17enPreprints, Working Papers, ...1Concurrent Constraint Programming (CCP) is a simple and powerful model for concurrency where agents interact by telling and asking constraints. Since their inception, CCP-languages have been designed for having a strong connection to logic. In fact, the underlying constraint system can be built from a suitable fragment of intuitionistic (linear) logic --ILL-- and processes can be interpreted as formulas in ILL. Constraints as ILL formulas fail to represent accurately situations where "preferences" (called soft constraints) such as probabilities, uncertainty or fuzziness are present. In order to circumvent this problem, c-semirings have been proposed as algebraic structures for defining constraint systems where agents are allowed to tell and ask soft constraints. Nevertheless, in this case, the tight connection to logic and proof theory is lost. In this work, we give a proof theoretical interpretation to soft constraints: they can be defined as formulas in a suitable fragment of ILL with subexponentials (SELL) where subexponentials, ordered in a c-semiring structure, are interpreted as preferences. We hence achieve two goals: (1) obtain a CCP language where agents can tell and ask soft constraints and (2) prove that the language in (1) has a strong connection with logic. Hence we keep a declarative reading of processes as formulas while providing a logical framework for soft-CCP based systems. An interesting side effect of (1) is that one is also able to handle probabilities (and other modalities) in SELL, by restricting the use of the promotion rule for non-idempotent c-semirings.This finer way of controlling subexponentials allows for considering more interesting spaces and restrictions, and it opens the possibility of specifying more challenging computational systems.