Notes on the synthesis of form, 1964. ,
Software Engineering Economics, 1981. ,
The Untrained Eye: How Languages for Software Specification Support Understanding in Untrained Users, Human???Computer Interaction, vol.14, issue.1-2, pp.191-244, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1080/07370024.1999.9667269
Visual notation design 2.0: Towards user comprehensible requirements engineering notations, 2013 21st IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp.115-124, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1109/RE.2013.6636711
Crowdsourcing systems on the World-Wide Web, Communications of the ACM, vol.54, issue.4, pp.86-96, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1145/1924421.1924442
Semantic transparency experiment artifacts, 2014. ,
A Handbook of Soft. and Sys. Engineering: Empirical Observations, Laws and Theories, 2003. ,
Analysing the Cognitive Effectiveness of??the??BPMN??2.0??Visual??Notation, Software Language Engineering, pp.377-396, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-19440-5_25
The chaos report, 1994. ,
Ontology-Based Evaluation and Design of Domain-Specific Visual Modeling Languages, Advances in Information Systems Development, pp.217-228, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-0-387-36402-5_19
Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Take Hold and Others Come Unstuck, 2008. ,
The details of conceptual modelling notations are important, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol.9, issue.10, 2002. ,
The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine, p.6, 2006. ,
Population stereotypy in code design, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.3, issue.3, pp.310-339, 1968. ,
Stereotypy in pictograms of abstract concepts, Ergonomics, vol.21, issue.6, 1983. ,
DOI : 10.1080/00140138308963379
Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words, Cognitive Science, vol.1, issue.1, pp.65-100, 1987. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.x
Design rationale systems: understanding the issues, IEEE Expert, vol.12, issue.3, p.97 ,
DOI : 10.1109/64.592267
Information Engineering, 1989. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00385182
Using Iconic Graphics in Entity-Relationship Diagrams, Journal of Database Management, vol.19, issue.3, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.4018/jdm.2008070102
An evaluation of i* visual syntax, 17th IEEE Int. Conference on Requirements Engineering, 2009. ,
Evaluating the Visual Syntax of UML: An Analysis of the Cognitive Effectiveness of the UML Family of Diagrams, Software Language Engineering, pp.16-34, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1518/001872001775870359
The “Physics” of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.35, issue.6, pp.756-779, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1109/TSE.2009.67
UML: an evaluation of the visual syntax of the language, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1109/HICSS.2001.926344
Participatory design, ACM Com, 1993. ,
The importance of both diagrammatic conventions and domain-specific knowledge for diagram literacy in science, Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, 2006. ,
Why looking isn't always seeing: readership skills and graphical programming, Communications of the ACM, vol.38, issue.6, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1145/203241.203251
Informational and Computational Equivalence in Comparing Information Modeling Methods, Journal of Database Management, vol.15, issue.1, pp.73-86, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.4018/jdm.2004010103