Evaluating scenario-based SPL requirements approaches: the case for modularity, stability and expressiveness

Abstract : Software product lines (SPL) provide support for productivity gains through systematic reuse. Among the various quality attributes supporting these goals, modularity, stability and expressiveness of feature specifications, their composition and configuration knowledge emerge as strategic values in modern software development paradigms. This paper presents a metric-based evaluation aiming at assessing how well the chosen qualities are supported by scenario-based SPL requirements approaches. The selected approaches for this study span from type of notation (textual or graphical based), style to support variability (annotation or composition based), and specification expressiveness. They are compared using the metrics developed in a set of releases from an exemplar case study. Our major findings indicate that composition-based approaches have greater potential to support modularity and stability, and that quantification mechanisms simplify and increase expressiveness of configuration knowledge and composition specifications.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [29 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01088537
Contributor : Mauricio Alférez <>
Submitted on : Monday, December 1, 2014 - 4:59:52 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, October 10, 2019 - 4:36:02 PM
Long-term archiving on : Monday, March 2, 2015 - 1:26:46 PM

File

REJ Alferez etal fresh in hal....
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Citation

Mauricio Alférez, Rodrigo Bonifácio, Leopoldo Teixeira, Paola Accioly, Uirá Kulesza, et al.. Evaluating scenario-based SPL requirements approaches: the case for modularity, stability and expressiveness. Requirements Engineering, Springer Verlag, 2014, 19 (4), pp.355 - 376. ⟨10.1007/s00766-013-0184-5⟩. ⟨hal-01088537⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

685

Files downloads

382