Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

On Evaluating Interestingness Measures for Closed Itemsets

Aleksey Buzmakov 1, 2 Sergei Kuznetsov 2 Amedeo Napoli 1
1 ORPAILLEUR - Knowledge representation, reasonning
Inria Nancy - Grand Est, LORIA - NLPKD - Department of Natural Language Processing & Knowledge Discovery
Abstract : There are a lot of measures for selecting interesting itemsets. But which one is better? In this paper we introduce a methodology for evaluating interesting-ness measures. This methodology relies on supervised classification. It allows us to avoid experts and artificial datasets in the evaluation process. We apply our method-ology to evaluate promising measures for itemset selection, such as leverage and stability. We show that although there is no evident winner between them, stability has a slightly better performance.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [17 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01095927
Contributor : Aleksey Buzmakov Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Tuesday, December 16, 2014 - 2:56:02 PM
Last modification on : Saturday, October 16, 2021 - 11:26:07 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Monday, March 23, 2015 - 2:06:55 PM

File

stairs-interestingness-measure...
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Aleksey Buzmakov, Sergei Kuznetsov, Amedeo Napoli. On Evaluating Interestingness Measures for Closed Itemsets. 7th European Starting AI Researcher Symposium (STAIRS 2014), 2014, Prague, Czech Republic. pp.71 - 80, ⟨10.3233/978-1-61499-421-3-71⟩. ⟨hal-01095927⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

576

Files downloads

349