Using typed lambda calculus to implement formal systems on a machine, Journal of Automated Reasoning, vol.49, issue.3, pp.309-354, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF00245294
Encoding Modal Logics in Logical Frameworks, Studia Logica, vol.60, issue.1, pp.161-208, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1005060022386
Pure Pattern Type Systems, Proc. of POPL, pp.250-261, 2003. ,
Proof-Assistants Using Dependent Type Systems, Handbook of Automated Reasoning, pp.1149-1238, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/B978-044450813-3/50020-5
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.17.7813
A companion to Modal Logic, 1984. ,
The calculus of constructions, Information and Computation, vol.76, issue.2-3, pp.95-120, 1988. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0890-5401(88)90005-3
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00076024
NuPRL as a General Logic, Logic and Computation, 1990. ,
Matching Power, Proc. of RTA, pp.77-92, 2001. ,
The Rho Cube, Proc. of FOSSACS, pp.166-180, 2001. ,
Implementing Mathematics with the Nuprl Proof Development System, 1986. ,
The Coq Home Page, 2006. ,
A Logical Framework with Dependently Typed Records, Prof. of TLCA, pp.105-119, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-44904-3_8
A Survey of the Project Automath, To H. B. Curry: Essays in Combinatory Logic, Lambda Calculus, and Formalism, pp.589-606, 1980. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0049-237X(08)70203-9
A Higher-Order Specification of the ??-Calculus, Proc. of IFIP TCS, pp.425-439, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-44929-9_30
Adding algebraic rewriting to the untyped lambda calculus, Information and Computation, vol.101, issue.2, pp.251-267, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0890-5401(92)90064-M
Finitary inductively presented logics, Proc. of Logic Colloquium, 1988. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0049-237X(08)70270-2
A Framework for Defining Logics Preliminary version in proc, Journal of the ACM, vol.4087, issue.1, pp.143-184, 1993. ,
Executable Higher-Order Algebraic Specification Languages, Proc. of LICS, pp.350-361, 1991. ,
On ??-conversion in the ??-cube and the combination with abbreviations, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol.97, issue.1-3, pp.1-327, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0168-0072(98)00019-0
Combinatory Reduction Systems: Introduction and Survey, Theoretical Computer Science, vol.121, pp.279-308, 1993. ,
A Language for Verification and Manipulation of Web Documents, Proc. of WWV, pp.127-137, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.entcs.2005.12.046
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01148880
ECC, an extended calculus of constructions, [1989] Proceedings. Fourth Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pp.385-395, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.1109/LICS.1989.39193
Intuitionistic Type Theory, volume 1 of Studies in Proof Theory, Bibliopolis, 1984. ,
Truth of a Proposition, Evidence of a Judgement, Validity of a Proof. Lecture given at the Workshop Theories of Meaning, 1985. ,
Selected Papers on Automath, 1994. ,
Strong normalizability for the combined system of the typed lmbda calculus and an arbitrary convergent term rewrite system, Proceedings of the ACM-SIGSAM 1989 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation , ISSAC '89, pp.357-363, 1989. ,
DOI : 10.1145/74540.74582
Confluence for Abstract and Higher-Order Rewriting, 1994. ,
Interactive Theorem Proving with Cambridge LCF, 1985. ,
Logical Frameworks, Handbook of Automated Reasoning, volume II, pp.1063-1147, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/B978-044450813-3/50019-9
Call by Name, Call by Value and the ?-calculus, Theoretical Computer Science, vol.1, pp.125-159, 1975. ,
System Description: Twelf ??? A Meta-Logical Framework for Deductive Systems, Proc. of CADE, pp.202-206, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-48660-7_14
Parallel reductions in ??-calculus, Journal of Symbolic Computation, vol.7, issue.2, pp.113-123, 1989. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0747-7171(89)80045-8
Lambda Calculus with Patterns, 1990. ,
Typage et déduction dans le calcul de réécriture, 2005. ,
F satisfies condition (c3) of Definition 3.22. Thus, for provingx]? F , it is sufficient to prove that CoDom(? SN F , since by the Subderivation Property 3.14, for each family A ? CoDom(?), there exists a smaller derivation of ? ? A : K; hence, we can apply the induction hypothesis to this latter derivation, Now, since Q ? B F , then, by Lemma 3.25, we get Q ? SN O . Moreover, CoDom by induction hypothesis, noticing that Dom(?) = Dom(?) ,
Moreover, by Lemma 3.25, we get A Thus, since SN O is closed under (c4), using the Subderivation Property 3, p.we get (?P :? ,