B. Ancell and G. Hakim, Comparing Adjoint- and Ensemble-Sensitivity Analysis with Applications to Observation Targeting, Monthly Weather Review, vol.135, issue.12, pp.4117-4134, 2007.
DOI : 10.1175/2007MWR1904.1

N. Ayoub, Estimation of boundary values in a North Atlantic circulation model using an adjoint method, Ocean Modelling, vol.12, issue.3-4, pp.3-4319, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ocemod.2005.06.003
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00434389

D. Cacuci, Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis: Theory, 2005.

W. Castaings, D. Dartus, L. Dimet, F. Saulnier, and G. , Sensitivity analysis and parameter estimation for distributed hydrological modeling: potential of variational methods, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol.13, issue.4, 2009.
DOI : 10.5194/hess-13-503-2009
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00391873

S. Chen, C. Wu, J. Chen, and K. Chou, Validation and Interpretation of Adjoint-Derived Sensitivity Steering Vector as Targeted Observation Guidance, Monthly Weather Review, vol.139, issue.5, pp.1608-1625, 2011.
DOI : 10.1175/2011MWR3490.1

D. Daescu and I. Navon, Reduced-Order Observation Sensitivity In 4D-Var Data Assimilation, 88th AMS Annual Meeting, 2008.

G. Desroziers, J. Camino, and L. Berre, 4DEnVar: link with 4D state formulation of variational assimilation and different possible implementations, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol.130, issue.684, pp.2097-2110, 2014.
DOI : 10.1002/qj.2325

R. Errico and T. Vukicevic, Sensitivity Analysis Using an Adjoint of the PSU-NCAR Mesoseale Model, Monthly Weather Review, vol.120, issue.8, pp.1644-1660, 1992.
DOI : 10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<1644:SAUAAO>2.0.CO;2

R. Giering and T. Kaminski, Recipes for adjoint code construction, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, vol.24, issue.4, pp.437-474, 1998.
DOI : 10.1145/293686.293695

A. Griewank and A. Walther, Evaluating derivatives: principles and techniques of algorithmic differentiation, 2008.
DOI : 10.1137/1.9780898717761

D. Hamby, A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol.64, issue.2, pp.135-154, 1994.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00547132

L. Hascoet and V. Pascual, The Tapenade automatic differentiation tool, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, vol.39, issue.3, p.20, 2013.
DOI : 10.1145/2450153.2450158
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00913983

P. Heimbach and V. Bugnion, Greenland ice-sheet volume sensitivity to basal, surface and initial conditions derived from an adjoint model, Annals of Glaciology, vol.50, issue.52, pp.67-80, 2009.
DOI : 10.3189/172756409789624256

B. Hoover and M. Morgan, Dynamical Sensitivity Analysis of Tropical Cyclone Steering Using an Adjoint Model, Monthly Weather Review, vol.139, issue.9, pp.2761-2775, 2011.
DOI : 10.1175/MWR-D-10-05084.1

C. Lauvernet, L. Hascoët, F. Dimet, and F. Baret, Using Automatic Differentiation to Study the Sensitivity of a Crop Model, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol.87, pp.59-69, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-30023-3_6
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01058645

L. Dimet, F. Ngodock, H. Luong, B. Verron, and J. , Sensitivity analysis in variational data assimilation, Journal-Meteorological Society of Japan Series, vol.2, pp.75135-145, 1997.

J. Lellouche, J. Devenon, and I. Dekeyser, Boundary control of Burgers' equation???a numerical approach, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol.28, issue.5, pp.33-34, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0898-1221(94)00138-3

S. Li and L. Petzold, Adjoint sensitivity analysis for time-dependent partial differential equations with adaptive mesh refinement, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.198, issue.1, pp.310-325, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.01.001

C. Liu, Q. Xiao, and B. Wang, An Ensemble-Based Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation Scheme. Part I: Technical Formulation and Preliminary Test, Monthly Weather Review, vol.136, issue.9, pp.3363-3373, 2008.
DOI : 10.1175/2008MWR2312.1

J. Marotzke, C. Wunsch, R. Giering, K. Zhang, D. Stammer et al., Construction of the adjoint MIT ocean general circulation model and application to Atlantic heat transport sensitivity, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, vol.57, issue.C12, 1999.
DOI : 10.1029/1999JC900236

M. Mu, W. Duan, and B. Wang, Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation and its applications, Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, vol.10, issue.6, pp.493-501, 2003.
DOI : 10.5194/npg-10-493-2003
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00302254

X. Qin and M. Mu, Influence of conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations sensitivity on typhoon track forecasts, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol.137, issue.662, pp.185-197, 2011.
DOI : 10.1002/qj.902

O. Rivì-ere, G. Lapeyre, and O. Talagrand, A novel technique for nonlinear sensitivity analysis: application to moist predictability, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol.45, issue.643, pp.1520-1537, 2009.
DOI : 10.1002/qj.460

A. Saltelli, M. Ratto, S. Tarantola, and F. Campolongo, Sensitivity Analysis for Chemical Models, Chemical Reviews, vol.105, issue.7, pp.2811-2828, 2005.
DOI : 10.1021/cr040659d

A. Sandu, D. Daescu, and G. Carmichael, Direct and adjoint sensitivity analysis of chemical kinetic systems with KPP: Part I???theory and software tools, Atmospheric Environment, vol.37, issue.36, pp.5083-5096, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.08.019

A. Sandu, D. Daescu, G. Carmichael, and T. Chai, Adjoint sensitivity analysis of regional air quality models, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.204, issue.1, pp.222-252, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.10.011

F. Sévellec, Optimal Surface Salinity Perturbations Influencing the Thermohaline Circulation, Journal of Physical Oceanography, vol.37, issue.12, pp.2789-2808, 2007.
DOI : 10.1175/2007JPO3680.1

J. Sykes, J. Wilson, and R. Andrews, Sensitivity Analysis for Steady State Groundwater Flow Using Adjoint Operators, Water Resources Research, vol.5, issue.1, pp.359-371, 1985.
DOI : 10.1029/WR021i003p00359

J. Thuburn and T. Haine, Adjoints of Nonoscillatory Advection Schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.171, issue.2, pp.616-631, 2001.
DOI : 10.1006/jcph.2001.6799

A. Vidard, E. Rémy, and E. Greiner, Sensitivity analysis through adjoint method: application to the GLORYS reanalysis, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00940839

C. Wu, J. Chen, P. Lin, and K. Chou, Targeted Observations of Tropical Cyclone Movement Based on the Adjoint-Derived Sensitivity Steering Vector, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol.64, issue.7, pp.2611-2626, 2007.
DOI : 10.1175/JAS3974.1

Y. Zhu and R. Gelaro, Observation Sensitivity Calculations Using the Adjoint of the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI) Analysis System, Monthly Weather Review, vol.136, issue.1, pp.335-351, 2008.
DOI : 10.1175/MWR3525.1

X. Zou, A. Barcilon, I. Navon, J. Whitaker, and D. Cacuci, An Adjoint Sensitivity Study of Blocking in a Two-Layer Isentropic Model, Monthly Weather Review, vol.121, issue.10, pp.2833-2857, 1993.
DOI : 10.1175/1520-0493(1993)121<2833:AASSOB>2.0.CO;2