S. Maier, Plasmonics -Fundamentals and applications, 2007.

Y. B. Zheng, B. Kiraly, P. S. Weiss, and T. J. Huang, Molecular plasmonics for biology and nanomedicine, Nanomedicine, vol.7, issue.5, pp.751-770, 2012.
DOI : 10.2217/nnm.12.30

A. Taflove and S. Hagness, Computational electrodynamics: the finite-difference time-domain method, 2005.

K. S. Yee, Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell's equations in isotropic media, IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagation, vol.14, issue.3, pp.302-307, 1966.

J. Hesthaven and T. Warburton, Nodal High-Order Methods on Unstructured Grids, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.181, issue.1, pp.186-221, 2002.
DOI : 10.1006/jcph.2002.7118

V. Kabakian, V. Shankar, and W. Hall, Unstructured Grid-Based Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Broadband Electromagnetic Simulations, Journal of Scientific Computing, vol.20, issue.3, pp.405-431, 2004.
DOI : 10.1023/B:JOMP.0000025932.17082.18

L. Fezoui, S. Lanteri, S. Lohrengel, and S. Piperno, Convergence and stability of a discontinuous Galerkin time-domain method for the 3D heterogeneous Maxwell equations on unstructured meshes, ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, vol.39, issue.6, pp.1149-1176, 2005.
DOI : 10.1051/m2an:2005049
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00210500

R. Ulbricht, E. Hendry, J. Shan, T. Heinz, and M. Bonn, Carrier dynamics in semiconductors studied with time-resolved terahertz spectroscopy, Reviews of Modern Physics, vol.83, issue.2, pp.543-586, 2011.
DOI : 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.543

C. Wolff, R. Rodrguez-oliveros, and K. Busch, Simple magneto???optic transition metal models for time???domain simulations, Optics Express, vol.21, issue.10, pp.12022-12037, 2013.
DOI : 10.1364/OE.21.012022

F. J. De-abajo, Graphene nanophotonics, 2016 Progress in Electromagnetic Research Symposium (PIERS), pp.917-918, 2013.
DOI : 10.1109/PIERS.2016.7735447

A. Moreau, C. Ciraci, and D. Smith, Impact of nonlocal response on metallodielectric multilayers and optical patch antennas, Physical Review B, vol.87, issue.4, pp.45401-45402, 2013.
DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.045401
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00756683

R. Diehl, K. Busch, and J. Niegemann, Comparison of Low-Storage Runge-Kutta Schemes for Discontinuous Galerkin Time-Domain Simulations of Maxwell's Equations, Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, vol.7, issue.8, p.1572, 2010.
DOI : 10.1166/jctn.2010.1521

K. Stannigel, M. Koenig, J. Niegemann, and K. Busch, Discontinuous Galerkin time-domain computations of metallic nanostructures, Optics Express, vol.17, issue.17, pp.14934-14947, 2009.
DOI : 10.1364/OE.17.014934

B. Zhu, J. Chen, W. Zhong, and Q. Liu, Analysis of photonic crystals using the hybrid finite-element/finite-difference time domain technique based on the discontinuous Galerkin method, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol.3, issue.6, pp.495-506, 2012.
DOI : 10.1002/nme.4348

J. Niegemann, M. König, K. Stannigel, and K. Busch, Higher-order time-domain methods for the analysis of nano-photonic systems, Photonics and Nanostructures - Fundamentals and Applications, vol.7, issue.1, pp.2-11, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.photonics.2008.08.006

K. Busch, M. König, and J. Niegemann, Discontinuous Galerkin methods in nanophotonics, Laser and Photonics Reviews, vol.5, pp.1-37, 2011.

C. Matysseka, J. Niegemann, W. Hergertb, and K. Busch, Computing electron energy loss spectra with the Discontinuous Galerkin Time-Domain method, Photonics and Nanostructures - Fundamentals and Applications, vol.9, issue.4, pp.367-373, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.photonics.2011.04.003

J. Niegemann, R. Diehl, and K. Busch, Efficient low-storage Runge???Kutta schemes with optimized stability regions, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.231, issue.2, pp.364-372, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.09.003

J. Viquerat, S. Lanteri, and C. Scheid, Theoretical and numerical analysis of local dispersion models coupled to a discontinuous Galerkin time-domain method for Maxwell's equations, INRIA Research Report RR, p.8298, 2013.