M. Indulska, Business Process Modeling: Current Issues and Future Challenges, pp.501-514, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/0016-3287(94)90016-7

URL : http://eprints.qut.edu.au/26020/2/26020.pdf

J. Mendling, H. A. Reijers, and J. Recker, Activity labeling in process modeling: Empirical insights and recommendations, Information Systems, vol.35, issue.4, pp.467-482, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.is.2009.03.009

W. Bandara, G. G. Gable, and M. Rosemann, Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.6, issue.4, pp.347-360, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-24703-6

Y. Wand and R. Weber, Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling???A Research Agenda, Information Systems Research, vol.13, issue.4, pp.363-376, 2002.
DOI : 10.1287/isre.13.4.363.69

I. Davies, How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? Data Knowl, Eng, vol.58, issue.3, pp.358-380, 2006.

J. Mendling, H. A. Reijers, and W. M. Van-der-aalst, Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG) Information and Software Technology, pp.127-136, 2010.

J. Mendling, Thresholds for error probability measures of business process models, Journal of Systems and Software, vol.85, issue.5, pp.1188-1197, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jss.2012.01.017

V. Gruhn and R. Laue, What business process modelers can learn from programmers, Science of Computer Programming, vol.65, issue.1, pp.4-13, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.scico.2006.08.003

H. A. Reijers and J. Mendling, A Study Into the Factors That Influence the Understandability of Business Process Models, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, vol.41, issue.3, pp.449-462, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/TSMCA.2010.2087017

K. Figl and R. Laue, Cognitive Complexity in Business Process Modeling, in Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp.452-466, 2011.

M. Montes-de-oca and I. , A systematic literature review of studies on business process modeling quality. Information and Software Technology, p.11, 2014.

H. J. Nelson, A conceptual modeling quality framework, Software Quality Journal, vol.13, issue.4, pp.201-228, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/s11219-011-9136-9

F. D. Davis, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, vol.13, issue.3, pp.319-340, 1989.
DOI : 10.2307/249008

A. L. Lederer, The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web, Decision Support Systems, vol.29, issue.3, pp.269-282, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00076-2

V. Venkatesh, User acceptance of information technology: towards a unified view, MIS Quarterly, vol.27, issue.3, pp.425-478, 2003.

V. Venkatesh, J. Y. Thong, and X. Xu, Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, MIS Quarterly, vol.36, issue.1, pp.157-178, 2012.

D. L. Moody, The method evaluation model: a theoretical model for validating information systems design methods, 2003.

C. Riemenschneider, B. Hardgrave, and F. Davis, Explaining software developer acceptance of methodologies: a comparison of five theoretical models, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.28, issue.12, pp.1135-1145, 2002.
DOI : 10.1109/TSE.2002.1158287

K. Amoako-gyampah, Perceived usefulness, user involvement and behavioral intention: an empirical study of ERP implementation, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.23, issue.3, pp.1232-1248, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.002

M. Turner, Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review, Information and Software Technology, vol.52, issue.5, pp.463-479, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.005

B. Weber, Refactoring large process model repositories, Computers in Industry, vol.62, issue.5, pp.467-486, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.compind.2010.12.012

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.228.6372

H. Reijers and J. Mendling, Modularity in Process Models: Review and Effects, Business Process Management, pp.20-35, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-85758-7_5

H. A. Reijers, J. Mendling, and R. M. Dijkman, Human and automatic modularizations of process models to enhance their comprehension, Information Systems, vol.36, issue.5, pp.881-897, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.is.2011.03.003

R. Laue and J. Mendling, Structuredness and its significance for correctness of process models Information Systems and E-Business Management, pp.287-307, 2010.

L. Rosa and M. , Managing Process Model Complexity via Concrete Syntax Modifications, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol.7, issue.2, pp.255-265, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/TII.2011.2124467

H. Abdi and L. J. Williams, Principal component analysis, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, vol.1, issue.4, pp.433-459, 2010.
DOI : 10.1002/wics.101

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01259094

O. I. Lindland, G. Sindre, and A. Solvberg, Understanding quality in conceptual modeling, IEEE Software, vol.11, issue.2, pp.42-49, 1994.
DOI : 10.1109/52.268955