R. Maes, An Integrative Perspective on Information Management Information Management: Setting the Scene, pp.11-26, 2007.

M. Bernaert, Enterprise Architecture for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Starting Point for Bringing Ea to Smes, Based on Adoption Models Information Systems and Small and Mediumsized Enterprises: State of art of IS research in SMEs, pp.67-96, 2013.

M. Lankhorst, Enterprise Architecture at Work, 2013.

R. Bhagwat and M. K. Sharma, Information system architecture: a framework for a cluster of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), Production Planning & Control, vol.42, issue.4, pp.283-296, 2007.
DOI : 10.1177/089124240001400106

S. G. Dehbokry and E. K. Chew, The Strategic Requirements for an Enterprise Business Architecture Framework by SMEs, Lecture Notes on Information Theory, vol.2, issue.1, pp.32-38, 2014.
DOI : 10.12720/lnit.2.1.32-38

D. Jacobs, Enterprise Architecture for Small and Medium Enterprise Growth, EEWC 2011. LNBIP, pp.61-75, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-6301(87)90071-9

M. Bernaert, CHOOSE: Towards a metamodel for enterprise architecture in small and medium-sized enterprises, Information Systems Frontiers, vol.26, issue.3, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s10796-015-9559-0

D. Ingelbeen, M. Bernaert, and G. Poels, Enterprise Architecture Software Tool Support for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Ease, 19th Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2013.

J. Dumeez, M. Bernaert, and G. Poels, Development of Software Tool Support for Enterprise Architecture in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops. LNBIP, pp.87-98, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-38490-5_7

M. Bernaert, J. Maes, and G. Poels, An Android Tablet Tool for Enterprise Architecture Modeling in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, pp.145-160, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-38490-5_7
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01474763

S. Zutterman, Development of a Tool for Business Architecture Modeling in Eclipse, 2013.

D. Moody, The “Physics” of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.35, issue.6, pp.756-778, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/TSE.2009.67

J. H. Larkin and H. A. Simon, Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words, Cognitive Science, vol.1, issue.1, pp.65-100, 1987.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.x

J. C. Recker, Do Process Modelling Techniques Get Better? A Comparative Ontological Analysis of Bpmn, 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 2005.

A. L. Opdahl and B. Henderson-sellers, Ontological Evaluation of the Uml Using the Bunge- Wand-Weber Model, Software & Systems Modeling, vol.1, issue.1, pp.43-67, 2002.

T. R. Green, Cognitive dimensions: Achievements, new directions, and open questions, Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, vol.17, issue.4, pp.328-365, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jvlc.2006.04.004

J. Krogstie, G. Sindre, and J. Havard, Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.40, issue.5, pp.91-102, 2006.
DOI : 10.1145/253769.253801

N. Genon, P. Heymans, and D. Amyot, Analysing the Cognitive Effectiveness of??the??BPMN??2.0??Visual??Notation, SLE 2010, pp.377-396, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-19440-5_25

D. Moody, Theory development in visual language research: Beyond the cognitive dimensions of notations, 2009 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC), pp.151-154, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/VLHCC.2009.5295275

J. Sweller, Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design, Learning and Instruction, vol.4, issue.4, pp.295-312, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5

M. Bernaert, Bridging Ea for Smes to Ea for Large Enterprises: Mapping Choose on the Archimate Standard, 2013.

D. Moody and J. Hillegersberg, Evaluating the Visual Syntax of UML: An Analysis of the Cognitive Effectiveness of the UML Family of Diagrams, SLE 2008, pp.16-34, 2009.
DOI : 10.1518/001872001775870359

D. Moody, P. Heymans, and R. Matulevi?ius, Visual syntax does matter: improving the cognitive effectiveness of the i* visual notation, Requirements Engineering, vol.18, issue.3, pp.141-175, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s00766-010-0100-1

N. Genon, D. Amyot, and P. Heymans, Analysing the Cognitive Effectiveness of the UCM Visual Notation, SAM 2010, pp.221-240, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-21652-7_14

S. Gopalakrishnan, J. Krogstie, and G. Sindre, Adapting UML Activity Diagrams for Mobile Work Process Modelling: Experimental Comparison of Two Notation Alternatives, pp.145-161, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-16782-9_11

W. Huang, P. Eades, and S. Hong, Measuring Effectiveness of Graph Visualizations: A Cognitive Load Perspective, Information Visualization, vol.53, issue.5, pp.139-152, 2009.
DOI : 10.1057/ivs.2009.10

A. Sonderegger and J. Sauer, The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performance and perceived usability, Applied Ergonomics, vol.41, issue.3, pp.403-410, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.09.002

S. R. Brown and L. E. Melamed, Experimental Design and Analysis, SAGE, 1990.
DOI : 10.4135/9781412984218

F. D. Davis, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, vol.13, issue.3, pp.319-340, 1989.
DOI : 10.2307/249008

F. G. Paas, Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach., Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.84, issue.4, p.429, 1992.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429

J. Tuovinen and F. Paas, Exploring Multidimensional Approaches to the Efficiency of Instructional Conditions, Instructional Science, vol.32, issue.1/2, pp.133-152, 2004.
DOI : 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021813.24669.62

E. Skovlund and G. U. Fenstad, Should we always choose a nonparametric test when comparing two apparently nonnormal distributions?, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.54, issue.1, pp.86-92, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00264-X