Dose finding with longitudinal data: simpler models, richer outcomes

Abstract : Phase I oncology clinical trials are designed to identify the optimal dose that will be recommended for phase II trials. This dose is typically defined as the dose associated with a certain probability of severe toxicity at cycle 1, although toxicity is repeatedly measured over cycles on an ordinal scale. Recently, a proportional odds mixed-effect model for ordinal outcomes has been proposed to (i) identify the optimal dose accounting for repeated events and (ii) to provide some framework to explore time trend. We compare this approach to a method based on repeated binary variables and to a method based on an under-parameterized model of the dose–time toxicity relationship. We show that repeated binary and ordinal outcomes both improve the accuracy of dose-finding trials in the same proportion; ordinal outcomes are, however, superior to detect time trend even in the presence of nonproportional odds models. Moreover, less parameterized models led to the best operating characteristics. These approaches are illustrated on two dose-finding phase I trials. Integration of repeated measurements is appealing in phase I dose-finding trials.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Statistics in Medicine, Wiley-Blackwell, 2015, 34 (22), 〈10.1002/sim.6552〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01288874
Contributeur : Sandrine Darmigny <>
Soumis le : mardi 15 mars 2016 - 16:45:58
Dernière modification le : vendredi 27 octobre 2017 - 16:54:11

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Xavier Paoletti, Adélaïde Doussau, Monia Ezzalfani, Elisa Rizzo, Rodolphe Thiébaut. Dose finding with longitudinal data: simpler models, richer outcomes. Statistics in Medicine, Wiley-Blackwell, 2015, 34 (22), 〈10.1002/sim.6552〉. 〈hal-01288874〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

175