J. C. Abric, Représentations sociales et pratiques, 1994.

J. C. Abric, L'organisation interne des représentations sociales: système central et système périphérique, C., Guimelli. Structure et transformation des représentations sociales, 1994.

M. Alavi and E. A. Joachimsthaler, Revisiting DSS Implementation Research: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature and Suggestions for Researchers, MIS Quarterly, vol.16, issue.1, pp.95-116, 1992.
DOI : 10.2307/249703

G. W. Alport, Attitudes, Handbook of social psychology, pp.798-844, 1935.

R. Baddoura and G. Venture, Social vs. Useful HRI: Experiencing the Familiar, Perceiving the Robot as a Sociable Partner and Responding to Its Actions, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol.12, issue.1, pp.529-547, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s12369-013-0207-x

C. Bartneck, T. Suzuki, T. Kanda, and T. Nomura, The influence of people???s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots, AI & SOCIETY, vol.187, issue.11, pp.217-230, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s00146-006-0052-7

J. M. Beer, A. Prakash, T. L. Mitzner, and W. A. Rogers, Understanding Robot Acceptance, p.39672, 1853.

C. Benmessaoud, H. Kharrazi, and K. F. Macdorman, Facilitators and Barriers to Adopting Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Contextualizing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, PLoS ONE, vol.43, issue.3, 2011.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0016395.s002

D. R. Billings, K. E. Schaefer, J. Y. Chen, and P. A. Hancock, Human-robot interaction, Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI '12, pp.109-110, 2012.
DOI : 10.1145/2157689.2157709

D. R. Billings, K. E. Schaefer, N. Llorens, and P. A. Hancock, What is Trust? Defining the construct across domains, 2012.

D. Biros, M. Daly, and G. Gunsch, The influence of task load and automation trust on deception detection. Group Decision and Negotiation, pp.173-189, 2004.

J. M. Burger and H. M. Cooper, The desirability of control, Motivation and Emotion, vol.31, issue.4, pp.381-393, 1979.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00994052

C. S. Burke, D. E. Sims, E. H. Lazzara, and E. Salas, Trust in Leadership: A multi-level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, pp.606-632, 2007.

D. Cameron, J. M. Aitken, E. C. Collins, L. Boorman, A. Chua et al., Framing Factors: The Importance of Context and the Individual in Understanding Trust in Human-Robot Interaction, Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Designing and Evaluating Social Robots for Public Settings, 2015.

R. Carnap, Introduction to semantics, 1942.

G. Charalambous, S. Fletcher, and P. Webb, The Development of a Scale to Evaluate Trust in Industrial Human-robot Collaboration, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol.7, issue.2, pp.1-17, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/s12369-015-0333-8

M. Coeckelbergh, Can we trust robots?, Ethics and Information Technology, vol.23, issue.3???4, pp.53-60, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/s10676-011-9279-1

R. J. Crisp and R. N. Turner, Imagined intergroup contact, Advances in Intergroup Contact, pp.135-151, 2012.

T. S. Dahl and M. N. Boulos, Robots in Health and Social Care: A Complementary Technology to Home Care and Telehealthcare?, Robotics, vol.3, issue.1, pp.1-21, 2013.
DOI : 10.3390/robotics3010001

F. Davis, R. Bagozzi, and R. Warshaw, User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models, Management Science, vol.35, issue.8, pp.982-1003, 1989.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

M. M. De-graaf and S. B. Allouch, Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol.61, issue.12, pp.1476-1486, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.robot.2013.07.007

M. Desai, K. Stubbs, A. Steinfeld, and H. Yanco, Creating Trustworthy Robots: Lessons and inspirations from automated systems Retrieved from https, Proceedings of the AISB Convention: New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, 2009.

D. Desteno, C. Breazeal, R. H. Frank, D. Pizarro, J. Baumann et al., Detecting the Trustworthiness of Novel Partners in Economic Exchange, Psychological Science, vol.19, issue.12, pp.1549-1556, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.006

M. Destephe, M. Brandao, T. Kishi, M. Zecca, K. Hashimoto et al., Walking in the uncanny valley: importance of the attractiveness on the acceptance of a robot as a working partner, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.2, p.204, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-39265-8_26

A. Dillon, User Acceptance of Information Technology Encyclopedia of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2001.

J. Dinet and R. Vivian, Exploratory investigation of attitudes towards assistive robots for future users, Le travail humain, vol.77, issue.2, pp.105-125, 2014.
DOI : 10.3917/th.772.0105
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01376994

B. Duffy, Anthropomorphism and the social robot, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol.42, issue.3-4, pp.177-190, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3

K. Eder, C. Harper, and U. Leonards, Towards the safety of human-in-the-loop robotics: Challenges and opportunities for safety assurance of robotic co-workers', The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp.660-665, 2014.
DOI : 10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926328

A. Evans and W. Revelle, Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust, Journal of Research in Personality, vol.42, issue.6, pp.1585-1593, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.07.011

K. Fischer, Interpersonal variation in understanding robots as social actors, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction, HRI '11, pp.53-60, 2011.
DOI : 10.1145/1957656.1957672

T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, and K. Dautenhahn, A survey of socially interactive robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol.42, issue.3-4, pp.143-166, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-X

A. Freedy, E. De-visser, G. Weltman, and N. Coeyman, Measurement of trust in human-robot collaboration, 2007 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems, pp.106-114, 2007.
DOI : 10.1109/CTS.2007.4621745

M. Fridin and M. Belokopytov, Acceptance of socially assistive humanoid robot by preschool and elementary school teachers, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.33, pp.23-31, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.016

M. Fumagalli, S. Ivaldi, M. Randazzo, L. Natale, G. Metta et al., Force feedback exploiting tactile and proximal force/torque sensing, Autonomous Robots, vol.2, issue.3, pp.381-398, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/s10514-012-9291-2

I. Gaudiello, S. Lefort, and E. Zibetti, The ontological and functional status of robots: How firm our representations are?, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.50, pp.259-273, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.060

I. Gaudiello, Learning robotics, with robotics, by robotics. A study on three educational paradigms of Educational Robotics, under the issues of robot representation, robot acceptance, and robot impact on learning, 2015.

V. Groom and C. Nass, Can robots be teammates? Benchmarks in human-robot teams, Interaction Studies, vol.8, issue.3, pp.483-500, 2007.

C. Guimelli, La pensée sociale, 1999.

L. Hamill and R. Harper, Talking intelligence: a historical and conceptual exploration of speech-based human-machine interaction in smart homes, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Intelligent Environments, pp.121-128, 2006.

P. A. Hancock, D. R. Billings, K. E. Schaefer, J. Y. Chen, E. J. De-visser et al., A metaanalysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction, Human Factors, issue.5, pp.53-517, 2011.

M. Heerink, Assessing acceptance of assistive social robots by aging adults, 2010.

M. Heerink, B. J. Kröse, B. J. Wielinga, and V. Evers, Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by??Older Adults: the Almere Model, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol.2, issue.2, pp.361-375, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5

M. Heerink, B. Krose, B. Wielinga, and V. Evers, Influence of Social Presence on Acceptance of an Assistive Social Robot and Screen Agent by Elderly Users, Advanced Robotics, vol.8, issue.2, pp.1909-1923, 2009.
DOI : 10.1163/016918609X12518783330289

P. J. Hinds, T. L. Roberts, and H. Jones, Whose Job Is It Anyway? A Study of Human-Robot Interaction in a Collaborative Task, Human-Computer Interaction, vol.22, issue.6, pp.151-181, 2004.
DOI : 10.1037//0021-9010.77.3.353

R. R. Hoffman, J. D. Lee, D. D. Woods, N. Shadbolt, J. Miller et al., The Dynamics of Trust in Cyberdomains, Human-Centered Computing, pp.5-11, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/MIS.2009.124

W. Hofmann, B. Gawronski, T. Gschwendner, H. Le, and M. Schmitt, A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol.31, issue.10, pp.1369-1385, 2005.
DOI : 10.1177/0146167205275613

A. I. Jack, A. J. Dawson, K. L. Begany, R. L. Leckie, K. P. Barry et al., fMRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domains, NeuroImage, vol.66, pp.385-401, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.061

M. Joosse, A. Sardar, M. Lohse, and V. Evers, BEHAVE-II: The Revised Set of Measures to Assess Users??? Attitudinal and Behavioral Responses to a Social Robot, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol.83, issue.3, pp.379-388, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s12369-013-0191-1

D. Kahneman, A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality., American Psychologist, vol.58, issue.9, pp.697-720, 2003.
DOI : 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697

H. Kamide, Y. Mae, T. Takubo, K. Ohara, and T. Arai, Direct comparison of psychological evaluation between virtual and real humanoids: Personal space and subjective impressions, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol.72, issue.5, pp.72-451, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.01.004

P. Kaniarasu, A. Steinfeld, M. Desai, and H. A. Yanco, Potential measures for detecting trust changes, Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI '12, pp.241-242, 2012.
DOI : 10.1145/2157689.2157775

F. Kaplan, WHO IS AFRAID OF THE HUMANOID? INVESTIGATING CULTURAL DIFFERENCES IN THE ACCEPTANCE OF ROBOTS, International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, vol.01, issue.03, pp.1-16, 2004.
DOI : 10.1142/S0219843604000289

F. Kaplan, Les machines apprivoisées, 2005.

C. D. Kidd, Sociable Robots: The Role of Presence and Task in Human-Robot Interaction, 2003.

K. L. Koay, D. S. Syrdal, M. Ashgari-oskoei, M. L. Walters, and K. Dautenhahn, Social Roles and Baseline Proxemic Preferences for a Domestic Service Robot, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol.25, issue.18, pp.469-488, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/s12369-014-0232-4

D. Kuchenbrandt and F. Eyssel, The mental simulation of a humanrobot interaction: Positive effects on attitudes and anxiety toward robots, Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2012), pp.463-468, 2012.

J. C. Lafferty and P. M. Eady, The desert survival problem, 1974.

J. D. Lee and K. A. See, Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol.46, issue.1, pp.50-80, 2004.
DOI : 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392

J. J. Lee, W. B. Knox, J. B. Wormwood, C. Beazeal, and D. Desteno, Computationally modeling interpersonal trust, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.4, pp.1-14, 2013.
DOI : 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00893

N. Lee, H. Shin, and S. S. Sundar, Utilitarian vs hedonic robots, role of parasocial tendency and anthropomorphism in shaping user attitudes, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human- Robot Interaction, pp.183-184, 2011.

D. Li, P. L. Rau, and Y. Li, A Cross-cultural Study: Effect of Robot Appearance and Task, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol.29, issue.1, pp.175-186, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s12369-010-0056-9

A. Lockerd and C. Breazeal, Tutelage and socially guided robot learning, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566), pp.3475-3480, 2004.
DOI : 10.1109/IROS.2004.1389954

M. Lohse, Investigating the influence of situations and expectations on user behavior ? empirical analyses in human-robot interaction, 2010.

R. Looije, M. A. Neerincx, and F. Cnossen, Persuasive robotic assistant for health self-management of older adults: Design and evaluation of social behaviors, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol.68, issue.6, pp.68-386, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.007

B. F. Malle, M. Scheutz, and J. Voiklis, Sacrifice One For the Good of Many? People Apply Different Moral Norms to Human and Robot Agents, Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp.117-124, 2015.

J. Marble, L. David, J. Bruemmer, D. Few, A. Dudenhoeffer et al., Evaluation of supervisory vs. peer-peer interaction with human-robot teams, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the, 2004.
DOI : 10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265326

N. Martelaro, V. Nneji, W. Ju, and P. Hinds, Tell Me More: Designing HRI to encourage more trust, disclosure and companionship. Accepted to Human Robot Interaction, 2016.

R. C. Mayer, J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman, An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, vol.20, pp.709-734, 1995.

M. Mcbride and S. Morgan, Trust Calibration for Automated Decision Aids Institute for Homeland Security Solutions Research brief Retrieved from: http://sites.duke Not all trust is created equal: Dispositional and history-based trust in humanautomation interactions, Human Factors, vol.12, issue.502, pp.1-11, 2008.

S. M. Merritt, H. Heimbaugh, J. Lachapell, and D. Lee, I Trust It, but I Don???t Know Why, Human Factors, vol.12, issue.2, pp.55-520, 2012.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.815

A. E. Monroe, K. D. Dillon, and B. F. Malle, Bringing free will down to Earth: People???s psychological concept of free will and its role in moral judgment, Consciousness and Cognition, vol.27, pp.100-108, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.concog.2014.04.011

R. P. Montague, Free will, Current Biology, vol.18, issue.14, pp.584-585, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.053

J. Mumm and B. Mutlu, Human-robot proxemics, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction, HRI '11, pp.33-338, 2011.
DOI : 10.1145/1957656.1957786

C. I. Nass, J. Steuer, E. R. Tauber, and H. Reeder, Anthropomorphism, agency, and ethopoeia, INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 conference companion on Human factors in computing systems , CHI '93, 1993.
DOI : 10.1145/259964.260137

C. Nass and Y. Moon, Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers, Journal of Social Issues, vol.56, issue.1, pp.81-103, 2000.
DOI : 10.1111/0022-4537.00153

C. Nass, B. J. Fogg, and Y. Moon, Can computers be teammates?, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol.45, issue.6, pp.669-678, 1996.
DOI : 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0073

C. Nass, Y. Moon, B. J. Fogg, and B. Reeves, Can computer personalities be human personalities?, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol.43, issue.2, pp.223-239, 1995.
DOI : 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1042

L. Natale, F. Nori, G. Metta, M. Fumagalli, S. Ivaldi et al., The iCub platform: a tool for studying intrinsically motivated learning Intrinsically motivated learning in natural and artificial systems, 2012.

S. Nichols, Experimental Philosophy and the Problem of Free Will, Science, vol.331, issue.6023, pp.1401-1403, 2011.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1192931

T. Nomura, Influences of experiences of robots into Negative Attitudes toward Robots, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp.460-464, 2014.
DOI : 10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926295

T. Nomura, T. Kanda, and T. Suzuki, Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human???robot interaction, AI & SOCIETY, vol.40, issue.2, pp.138-150, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s00146-005-0012-7

L. Oestreicher and K. S. Eklundh, User Expectations on Human-Robot Co-operation, ROMAN 2006, The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp.91-96, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/ROMAN.2006.314400

S. Y. Okita, V. Ng-thow-hing, and R. K. Sarvadevabhatla, Captain May I? Proxemics Study Examining Factors that Influence Distance between Humanoid Robots, Children, and Adults during Human-Robot Interaction, Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp.203-204, 2012.

T. M. Ostrom, The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.5, issue.1, pp.12-30, 1969.
DOI : 10.1016/0022-1031(69)90003-1

R. Parasuraman and V. Riley, Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol.39, issue.2, pp.230-253, 1997.
DOI : 10.1518/001872097778543886

E. Park, Q. Jenkins, and X. Jiang, Measuring trust of human operators in new generation rescue robots The Japan Fluid, Proceedings of the JFPS International Symposium on Fluid Power, pp.489-492, 2008.

J. Piaget, Logique et connaissance scientifique, 1967.

R. W. Picard and S. B. Daily, Evaluating affective interactions: Alternatives to asking what users feel, Proceedings of CHI Workshop 'Evaluating Affective Interfaces'. Portland, 2005.

K. R. Popper, La connaissance objective, 1991.

D. T. Regan and R. Fazio, On the consistency between attitudes and behavior: Look to the method of attitude formation, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.13, issue.1, pp.28-45, 1977.
DOI : 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90011-7

L. D. Riek, Wizard of Oz Studies in HRI: A Systematic Review and New Reporting Guidelines, Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, vol.1, issue.1, pp.119-136, 2012.
DOI : 10.5898/JHRI.1.1.Riek

L. D. Riek and P. Robinson, Robot, rabbit, or red herring? Societal acceptance as a function of classification ease, Paper presented at the 17th International IEEE Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Workshop Robots as Social Actors: Evaluating Social Acceptance and Societal Impact of Robotic Agents, 2008.

N. Riether, On the Profoundness and Preconditions of Social Responses towards Social Robots. Experimental investigations using indirect measurement techniques, 2013.

E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of innovations, 1995.

J. B. Rotter, Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust., American Psychologist, vol.26, issue.5, pp.443-452, 1971.
DOI : 10.1037/h0031464

M. Salem, G. Lakatos, F. Amirabdollahian, and K. Dautenhahn, Towards Safe and Trustworthy Social Robots: Ethical Challenges and Practical Issues, Social Robotics, pp.584-593, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_58

M. Salem, G. Lakatos, F. Amirabdollahian, and K. Dautenhahn, Would you trust a (faulty) robot? Effects of error, task type and personality on human-robot cooperation and trust, 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp.141-148, 2015.

P. Salvini, C. Laschi, and P. Dario, Design for Acceptability: Improving Robots??? Coexistence in??Human Society, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol.19, issue.6, pp.451-460, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s12369-010-0079-2

T. Sanders, B. Harpold, T. Kessler, and P. A. Hancock, Interpersonal distance effects on trust relationships in human-robot interaction, Proceedings 19th Triennial Congress of the IEA, p.14, 2015.

K. E. Schaefer, The Perception And Measurement Of Human-Robot Trust, 2013.

R. D. Schraft, C. Meyer, C. Parlitz, and E. Helms, PowerMate ??? A Safe and Intuitive Robot Assistant for Handling and Assembly Tasks, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp.4047-4079, 2005.
DOI : 10.1109/ROBOT.2005.1570745

M. A. Serva, M. A. Fuller, and R. C. Mayer, The reciprocal nature of trust: a longitudinal study of interacting teams, Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol.4, issue.6, pp.625-648, 2005.
DOI : 10.1002/job.331

R. L. Severson and S. M. Carlson, Behaving as or behaving as if? Children???s conceptions of personified robots and the emergence of a new ontological category, Neural Networks, vol.23, issue.8-9, pp.1099-1103, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.neunet.2010.08.014

G. Shaw-garlock, Looking Forward to Sociable Robots, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol.8, issue.3, pp.249-260, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s12369-009-0021-7

K. Shinozawa, F. Naya, J. Yamato, and K. Kogure, Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol.62, issue.2, pp.267-279, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.11.003

M. S. Siegel, Persuasive Robotics How Robots Change our Minds (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology), 2008.

H. Sun and P. Zhang, The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol.64, issue.2, pp.53-78, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.013

J. Sung, H. I. Christensen, and R. E. Grinter, Robots in the wild, Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, HRI '09, pp.45-52, 2009.
DOI : 10.1145/1514095.1514106

D. S. Syrdal, K. L. Koay, M. L. Walters, and K. Dautenhahn, A personalized robot companion? - The role of individual differences on spatial preferences in HRI scenarios, RO-MAN 2007, The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp.1143-1148, 2007.
DOI : 10.1109/ROMAN.2007.4415252

J. L. Szalma and G. S. Taylor, Individual differences in response to automation: The five factor model of personality., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, vol.17, issue.2, p.71, 2011.
DOI : 10.1037/a0024170

S. Thrun, Toward a Framework for Human-Robot Interaction, Human-Computer Interaction, vol.19, issue.2, pp.9-24, 2004.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1008918401478

M. Touré-tillery and A. L. Mcgill, Who or What to Believe: Trust and the Differential Persuasiveness of Human and Anthropomorphized Messengers, Journal of Marketing, vol.79, issue.4, pp.94-110, 2015.
DOI : 10.1509/jm.12.0166

S. Turkle, R. Van-den-brule, R. Dotsch, G. Bijlstra, D. H. Wigboldus et al., Alone together. Why we expect more from technology and less from each other Basic Books Do Robot Performance and Behavioral Style affect Human Trust?, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol.6, issue.4, pp.519-531, 2011.

V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly, vol.27, issue.3, pp.425-478, 2003.

M. L. Walters, K. Dautenhahn, R. Boekhorst, K. L. Koay, C. Kaouri et al., The influence of subjects' personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005., pp.347-352, 2005.
DOI : 10.1109/ROMAN.2005.1513803

J. Walter-herrmann and C. Büching, FabLab: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors, 2014.
DOI : 10.14361/transcript.9783839423820

A. Weiss, R. Bernhaupt, L. Aarts, E. H. Crowley, J. L. Ruyter et al., The influence of control on the acceptance of ambient intelligence by elderly people: An explorative study, pp.2008-58, 2008.

A. Weiss, R. Bernhaupt, M. Lankes, and M. Tscheligi, The USUS Evaluation Framework for Human- Robot Interaction, Proceedings of the Symposium on New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, pp.158-165, 2009.

K. C. Welch, U. Lahiri, Z. Warren, and N. Sarkar, An Approach to the Design of Socially Acceptable Robots for??Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol.1, issue.4, pp.391-403, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s12369-010-0063-x

R. Wullenkord and F. Eyssel, Improving attitudes towards social robots using imagined contact, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp.489-538, 2014.
DOI : 10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926300

R. E. Yagoda and D. J. Gillan, You Want Me to Trust a ROBOT? The Development of a Human???Robot Interaction Trust Scale, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol.28, issue.1, pp.235-248, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/s12369-012-0144-0

R. E. Yagoda, What! You want me to trust a robot? The development of a human robot interaction (HRI) trust scale, 2011.

H. A. Yanco and J. L. Drury, A taxonomy for human-robot interaction, Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Human-Robot Interaction. AAAI Technical Report FS-02-03, pp.111-119, 2002.

J. E. Young, R. Hawkins, E. Sharlin, and T. Igarashi, Toward Acceptable Domestic Robots: Applying Insights from??Social Psychology, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol.17, issue.1, pp.95-108, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s12369-008-0006-y

A. J. Yu, Decision-Making Tasks. Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience, pp.931-937, 2015.

L. Zaad and S. Ben-allouch, The Influence of Control on the Acceptance of Ambient Intelligence by Elderly People: An Explorative Study, Ambient Intelligence, Series Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.5355, pp.58-74, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-89617-3_5