Shared Tasks of the 2015 Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text: Twitter Lexical Normalization and Named Entity Recognition, Proceedings of the Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.18653/v1/W15-4319
Overview of the Evalita 2014 SENTIment POLarity Classification Task, Proc. of EVALITA 2014, 2014. ,
Entity based sentiment analysis on twitter, Science, vol.9, issue.4, pp.1-12, 2010. ,
Pulse: Mining Customer Opinions from Free Text, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis, IDA'05, pp.121-132, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1007/11552253_12
Improving the quality of predictions using textual information in online user reviews, Information Systems, vol.38, issue.1, pp.1-15, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.is.2012.03.001
SemEval-2015 Task 11: Sentiment Analysis of Figurative Language in Twitter, Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), pp.470-475, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.18653/v1/S15-2080
To link or not to link? a study on end-toend tweet entity linking, Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp.1020-1030, 2013. ,
Mining and summarizing customer reviews, Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining , KDD '04, pp.168-177, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1145/1014052.1014073
Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol, issue.11, pp.602169-2188, 2009. ,
Towards a Contextual Pragmatic Model to Detect Irony in Tweets, Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 2: Short Papers), pp.644-650, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.3115/v1/P15-2106
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01334719
You are what you tweet: Analyzing twitter for public health, Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp.265-272, 2011. ,
Semeval-2013 task 2: Sentiment analysis in twitter, Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM) Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pp.312-320, 2013. ,
From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series, Intl AAAI Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), pp.122-129, 2010. ,
Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining, Proc. of the Seventh Intl Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'10), 2010. ,
Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Foundations and trends in information retrieval, pp.1-135, 2008. ,
Ion Androutsopoulos, and Suresh Manandhar. 2014. Semeval-2014 task 4: Aspect based sentiment analysis, Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pp.27-35, 2014. ,
SemEval-2015 Task 12: Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis, Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), pp.486-495, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.18653/v1/S15-2082
SemEval-2014 Task 9: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter, Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014), pp.73-80, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.3115/v1/S14-2009
SemEval-2015 Task 10: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter, Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), 2015. ,
DOI : 10.18653/v1/S15-2078
(How) will the revolution be retweeted?, Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '12, pp.7-16, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1145/2145204.2145212
Sentiment strength detection for the social web, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol.6458, issue.2, pp.163-173, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1002/asi.21662
Aspect-based sentiment analysis of movie reviews on discussion boards, Journal of Information Science, vol.7, issue.5, pp.823-848, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1177/0165551510388123
Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment, 2010. ,
Annotating Expressions of Opinions and Emotions in Language, Language Resources and Evaluation, vol.7, issue.3, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s10579-005-7880-9