An Empirical Study of Adoption of Software Testing in Open Source Projects, 2013 13th International Conference on Quality Software, pp.103-112, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1109/QSIC.2013.57
The impact of code review coverage and code review participation on software quality: a case study of the qt, VTK, and ITK projects, Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, MSR 2014, pp.192-201, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1145/2597073.2597076
Who should review my code? a file location-based codereviewer recommendation approach for modern code review, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER'15), pp.141-150, 2015. ,
Pilot study of collective decisionmaking in the code review process, Proceedings of the Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research (CASCON'15), 2015. ,
Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review, 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp.712-721, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606617
Peer code review in open source communitiesusing reviewboard, Proceedings of the ACM 4th annual workshop on Evaluation and usability of programming languages and tools, PLATEAU '12, pp.17-24, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1145/2414721.2414726
Convergent contemporary software peer review practices, Proceedings of the 2013 9th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering, ESEC/FSE 2013, pp.202-212, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1145/2491411.2491444
Do code review practices impact design quality? A case study of the Qt, VTK, and ITK projects, 2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER), pp.2015-171 ,
DOI : 10.1109/SANER.2015.7081827
Who does what during a code review? Datasets of OSS peer review repositories, 2013 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pp.49-52, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1109/MSR.2013.6624003
Gerrit software code review data from Android, 2013 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pp.45-48, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1109/MSR.2013.6624002
Will my patch make it? And how fast? Case study on the Linux kernel, 2013 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pp.101-110, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1109/MSR.2013.6624016
Writing Acceptable Patches: An Empirical Study of Open Source Project Patches, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution, pp.271-280, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1109/ICSME.2014.49
Small patches get in!, Proceedings of the 2008 international workshop on Mining software repositories , MSR '08, pp.67-76, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1145/1370750.1370767
Who should review this change?: Putting text and file location analyses together for more accurate recommendations, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), pp.2015-261 ,
DOI : 10.1109/ICSM.2015.7332472
Understanding broadcast based peer review on open source software projects, Proceeding of the 33rd international conference on Software engineering, ICSE '11, pp.541-550, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1145/1985793.1985867
State-of-the-art: software inspections after 25 years, Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, pp.133-154, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1002/stvr.243
Learning Gerrit Code Review, 2013. ,
Investigating Code Review Practices in Defective Files: An Empirical Study of the Qt System, 2015 IEEE/ACM 12th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pp.2015-168 ,
DOI : 10.1109/MSR.2015.23