H. J. Scholl, Electronic Government Research: Topical Directions and Preferences, Electronic Government, pp.1-13, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-40358-3_1

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01490910

A. J. Meijer, D. Curtin, and M. Hillebrandt, Open government: connecting vision and voice, International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol.46, issue.7, pp.10-29, 2012.
DOI : 10.1177/0020852311429533

D. Linders and S. C. Wilson, What is Open Government? One Year after the Directive, 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (Dg.o'11), pp.262-271, 2011.

M. Bovens, Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework, European Law Journal, vol.66, issue.4, pp.447-468, 2007.
DOI : 10.1177/0020852300661005

P. T. Jaeger and J. C. Bertot, Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information, Government Information Quarterly, vol.27, issue.4, pp.371-376, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.003

R. P. Lourenço, Data disclosure and transparency for accountability: A strategy and case analysis, Information Polity, vol.18, pp.243-260, 2013.

D. Coy and K. Dixon, The public accountability index: crafting a parametric disclosure index for annual reports, The British Accounting Review, vol.36, issue.1, pp.79-106, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.bar.2003.10.003

J. Becker, R. Knackstedt, and J. Pöppelbuß, Developing Maturity Models for IT Management, Business & Information Systems Engineering, vol.24, issue.3, pp.213-222, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s12599-009-0044-5

D. Bruin, T. Freeze, R. Kaulkarni, U. And-rosemann, and M. , Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model, 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), pp.8-19, 2005.

G. Klimko, Knowledge Management and Maturity Models: Building Common Understanding, Second European Conference on Knowledge Management, pp.269-278, 2001.

K. N. Andersen, R. Medaglia, R. Vatrapu, H. Z. Henriksen, and R. Gauld, The forgotten promise of e-government maturity: Assessing responsiveness in the digital public sector, Government Information Quarterly, vol.28, issue.4, pp.439-445, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.giq.2010.12.006

K. V. Andersen and H. Z. Henriksen, E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model, Government Information Quarterly, vol.23, issue.2, pp.236-248, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.008

K. Layne and J. Lee, Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model, Government Information Quarterly, vol.18, issue.2, pp.122-136, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1

J. Lee, 10year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis, Government Information Quarterly, vol.27, issue.3, pp.220-230, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.009

K. Siau and Y. Long, Synthesizing e???government stage models ??? a meta???synthesis based on meta???ethnography approach, Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol.105, issue.4, pp.443-458, 2005.
DOI : 10.1108/02635570510592352

E. Tambouris, N. Liotas, and K. Tarabanis, A Framework for Assessing eParticipation Projects and Tools, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07), p.90, 2007.
DOI : 10.1109/HICSS.2007.13

A. Macintosh, Using information and communication technologies to enhance citizen engagement in the policy process. Promises and problems of e-democracy: challenges of citizen online engagement, pp.19-142, 2003.

R. P. Lourenço, From e-Government and e-Democracy to e-Governance: a unified view, Electronic Government and Electronic Participation: Joint Proceedings of Ongoing Research and Projects of IFIP EGOV and ePart 2011, pp.345-351, 2011.

E. Kalampokis, E. Tambouris, and K. Tarabanis, Open Government Data: A Stage Model
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-22878-0_20

G. Lee and Y. H. Kwak, An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement, Government Information Quarterly, vol.29, issue.4, pp.492-503, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.001

E. Kalampokis, E. Tambouris, and K. Tarabanis, A classification scheme for open government data: towards linking decentralised data, International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology, vol.6, issue.3, pp.266-285, 2011.
DOI : 10.1504/IJWET.2011.040725

N. Huijboom and T. V. Broek, Open data: an international comparison of strategies, European Journal of ePractice, vol.12, pp.1-12, 2011.

L. Reggi and C. A. Ricci, Information Strategies for Open Government in Europe: EU Regions Opening Up the Data on Structural Funds, Electronic Government -10th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, pp.173-184, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-22878-0_15

D. Heald, Why is transparency about public expenditure so elusive?, International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol.39, issue.1, pp.30-49, 2012.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781139165518

M. Bovens, D. Curtin, H. , and P. , Towards a More Accountable EU: Retrospective and Roadmap, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2010.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1687595

URL : http://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.335913

C. Scott, Accountability in the Regulatory State, Journal of Law and Society, vol.27, issue.1, pp.38-60, 2000.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-6478.00146

N. Shadbolt, K. O-'hara, T. Berners-lee, N. Gibbins, H. Glaser et al., Linked Open Government Data: Lessons from Data.gov.uk. Intelligent Systems, pp.16-24, 2012.
DOI : 10.1109/mis.2012.23

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

C. Bizer, T. Heath, and T. Berners-lee, Linked Data - The Story So Far, International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, vol.5, issue.3, pp.1-22, 2009.
DOI : 10.4018/jswis.2009081901