T. Dybå and T. Dingsøyr, Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review, Information and Software Technology, vol.50, issue.9-10, pp.9-10, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006

P. J. Ågerfalk, S. Fitzgerald, and . Slaughter, ???Flexible and Distributed Information Systems Development: State of the Art and Research Challenges, Information Systems Research, vol.20, issue.3, pp.317-318, 2009.
DOI : 10.1287/isre.1090.0244

K. Conboy, Agility from First Principles: Reconstructing the Concept of Agility in Information Systems Development, Information Systems Research, vol.20, issue.3, pp.329-354, 2009.
DOI : 10.1287/isre.1090.0236

H. Takeuchi and I. Nonaka, The New New Product Development Game, Harvard Business Review, 1986.

J. Sutherland and K. Schwaber, The Scrum Papers: Nut, Bolts, and Origins of an Agile Framework, 2010.

R. K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods 4th ed2008

C. C. Ragin, Constructing Social Research: The Unity and Diversity of Method1994

F. Znaniecki, &. Farrar, and . Rinehart, The method of sociology1934

M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods

J. E. Van-aken, Management Research as a Design Science: Articulating the Research Products of Mode 2 Knowledge Production in Management, British Journal of Management, vol.11, issue.1, pp.19-36, 2005.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x

T. Burns and G. M. Stalker, The Management of Innovation1961

K. Lyytinen, A Taxanomic Perspective of Information Systems Development. Theoretical Constructs and Recommendations, Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, 1987.

J. Bansler and K. Bødker, A reappraisal of structured analysis: design in an organizational context, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol.11, issue.2, pp.165-193, 1993.
DOI : 10.1145/130226.148055

D. P. Truex, R. Baskerville, and J. Travis, Amethodical Systems Development: The Deferred Meaning of Systems Development Methods. Accounting, Management and Information Technology, pp.53-79, 2000.

H. C. Esfahani, Situational Evaluation of Method Fragments: An Evidence-Based Goal-Oriented Approach, Advanced Information Systems Engineering2010, pp.424-438
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00540755

C. Rolland, N. Prakash, S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen, and R. Welke, A proposal for context-specific method engineering, in Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and support, pp.191-208, 1996.

W. Tan and C. Tan, Teaching Information Systems Development via Process Variants, Journal of Information Systems Education, vol.21, issue.2, pp.159-172, 2010.

J. J. Odell, S. Brinkkkemper, K. Lyytinen, and R. Welke, A primer to method engineering, in Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support, pp.1-7, 1996.

S. B. Schapiro and M. H. Henry, Engineering agile systems through architectural modularity, 2012 IEEE International Systems Conference SysCon 2012, p.2012
DOI : 10.1109/SysCon.2012.6189529

E. Berki, Formal metamodelling and agile method engineering in metaCASE and CAME tool environments, in Proceedings of The 1st South-East European Workshop on Formal Methods, pp.170-188, 2004.

K. Van-slooten, Situated Method Engineering, Information Resources Management Journal, vol.9, issue.3, pp.24-31, 1996.
DOI : 10.4018/irmj.1996070103

B. Henderson-sellers and M. K. Serour, Creating a Dual-Agility Method, Journal of Database Management, vol.16, issue.4, pp.1-23, 2005.
DOI : 10.4018/jdm.2005100101

F. Karlsson and K. Wistrand, Combining method engineering with activity theory: theoretical grounding of the method component concept, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.50, issue.12, pp.82-90, 2006.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:12<1136::AID-ASI17>3.0.CO;2-0

F. Karlsson and P. J. Agerfalk, Method configuration: adapting to situational characteristics while creating reusable assets. Information and Software Technology, pp.619-633, 2004.

P. Ravesteyn, A Context Dependent Implementation Method for Business Process Management Systems. Communications of the IIMA, pp.31-45, 2009.

G. Low, H. Mouratidisb, and B. Henderson-sellers, Using a Situational Method Engineering Approach to Identify Reusable Method Fragments from the Secure TROPOS Methodology., The Journal of Object Technology, vol.9, issue.4, pp.91-125, 2010.
DOI : 10.5381/jot.2010.9.4.a5

M. Puviani, A method fragments approach to methodologies for engineering self-organizing systems, ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems, vol.7, issue.3, 2012.
DOI : 10.1145/2348832.2348836

R. Domges and K. Pohl, Adapting traceability environments to project-specific needs, Communications of the ACM, vol.41, issue.12, pp.41-54, 1998.
DOI : 10.1145/290133.290149

P. Haumer, K. Pohl, and K. Weidenhaupt, Requirements elicitation and validation with real world scenes, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.24, issue.12, pp.24-1036, 1998.
DOI : 10.1109/32.738338
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.45.3037

M. N. Aydin, On the Adaptation of an Agile Information Systems Development Method, Journal of Database Management, vol.16, issue.4, pp.24-40, 2005.

J. Pries-heje and R. Baskerville, The design theory nexus, MIS Quarterly, vol.32, issue.4, pp.731-755, 2008.

J. M. Carroll and W. A. Kellogg, Artifact as theory-nexus: hermeneutics meets theory-based design. CM SIGCHI Bulletin, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Wings for the mind, pp.20-27, 1989.
DOI : 10.1145/67450.67452
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.472.7850