A. Acquisti and J. Grossklags, Privacy and rationality in individual decision making, IEEE Security and Privacy Magazine, vol.3, issue.1, pp.26-33, 2005.
DOI : 10.1109/MSP.2005.22

A. Acquisti and J. Grossklags, Losses, Gains, and Hyperbolic Discounting: An Experimental Approach to Information Security Attitudes and Behavior, 2nd Annual Workshop on Economics and Information Security -WEIS, 2003.

M. A. Cusumano, Platform wars come to social media, Communications of the ACM, vol.54, issue.4, pp.31-33, 2011.
DOI : 10.1145/1924421.1924433

G. Müller, C. Flender, and M. Peters, Vertrauensinfrastruktur und Privatheit alsökonomische als¨alsökonomische Fragestellung: Internet Privacy -Eine multidisziplinäre Bestandsaufnahme/A Multidisciplinary Analysis, 2012.

C. Flender and G. Müller, Type Indeterminacy in Privacy Decisions: The Privacy Paradox Revisited, Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Quantum Interaction, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-35659-9_14

L. Festinger, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, 1957.

A. Westin, Privacy and Freedom, 1967.

A. Hevner, S. March, J. Park, and S. Ram, Design Science Research in Information Systems, MIS quarterly, vol.28, pp.75-105, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8_2

A. Deuker, Addressing the privacy paradox by expanded privacy awareness the example of context-aware services Privacy and Identity Management for Life, Volume IFIP AICT, pp.275-283, 2010.

S. Spiekermann, J. Grossklags, and B. Berendt, E-privacy in 2nd generation ecommerce: privacy preferences versus actual behavior, Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on Electronic Commerce, pp.38-47, 2001.

N. Awad and M. Krishnan, The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization, MIS quarterly, pp.13-28, 2006.

P. Norberg, D. Horne, and D. Horne, The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors, Journal of Consumer Affairs, vol.14, issue.1 and 2, pp.100-126, 2007.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x

F. Völckner, An empirical comparison of methods for measuring consumers??? willingness to pay, Marketing Letters, vol.39, issue.2, pp.137-149, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s11002-006-5147-x

K. Miller, R. Hofstetter, H. Krohmer, and J. Zhang, How Should Consumers' Willingness to Pay Be Measured? An Empirical Comparison of State-of-the-Art Approaches, Journal of Marketing Research, vol.48, issue.1, pp.172-184, 2011.
DOI : 10.1509/jmkr.48.1.172

H. Krasnova, T. Hildebrand, and O. Guenther, Investigating the value of privacy in online social networks: Conjoint analysis, Proceeding of ICIS, 2009.

A. Beresford, D. Kübler, and S. Preibusch, Unwillingness to pay for privacy: A field experiment, Economics Letters, vol.117, issue.1, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.077

C. Bauer, J. Korunovska, and S. Spiekermann, On the value of information -What Facebook users are willing to pay, Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Information Systems, 2012.

G. Becker, M. Degroot, and J. Marschak, Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method, Behavioral Science, vol.59, issue.3, p.226232, 1964.
DOI : 10.1002/bs.3830090304

A. Acquisti, L. John, and G. Loewenstein, What Is Privacy Worth?, The Journal of Legal Studies, vol.42, issue.2, 2009.
DOI : 10.1086/671754

M. Schreier and J. Werfer, Auktionen versus Lotterien: Ein empirischer Vergleich zur Messung von Zahlungsbereitschaften, Die Betriebswirtschaft, vol.67, pp.22-40, 2007.

I. Bateman and N. Powe, Ordering effects in nested 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' contingent valuation designs, Ecological Economics, vol.45, issue.2, pp.255-270, 2003.

H. Atmanpacher and H. Römer, Order effects in sequential measurements of non-commuting psychological observables, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol.56, issue.4, pp.274-280, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jmp.2012.06.003

B. Cai, T. Cameron, and G. Gerdes, Distal order effects in stated preference surveys, Ecological Economics, vol.70, issue.6, pp.1101-1108, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.018

I. Bateman, P. Cooper, S. Georgiou, and G. Poe, On visible choice sets and scope sensitivity, Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00057-3

J. Clark and L. Friesen, The causes of order effects in contingent valuation surveys: An experimental investigation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.56, issue.2, pp.195-206, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2007.12.005

K. Boyle, M. Welsh, and R. Bishop, The Role of Question Order and Respondent Experience in Contingent-Valuation Studies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.25, issue.1, pp.80-99, 1993.
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1993.1034

B. Kartman, N. Stalhammar, and M. Johannesson, Valuation of health changes with the contingent valuation method: A test of scope and question order effects, Health Economics, vol.5, issue.6, pp.531-541, 1996.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199611)5:6<531::AID-HEC235>3.0.CO;2-J

V. Kumar and G. Gaeth, Attribute order and product familiarity effects in decision tasks using conjoint analysis, International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol.8, issue.2, pp.113-124, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/0167-8116(91)90019-4

K. Chrzan, Three kinds of order effects in choice-based conjoint analysis, Marketing Letters, vol.53, issue.2, pp.165-172, 1994.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00994106

M. Celko, Die Echokammer Abstrakt: Die grosse Gemeinschaft, W.I.R.E. Collegium Helveticum, vol.9, pp.25-31, 2012.