Privacy and rationality in individual decision making, IEEE Security and Privacy Magazine, vol.3, issue.1, pp.26-33, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1109/MSP.2005.22
Losses, Gains, and Hyperbolic Discounting: An Experimental Approach to Information Security Attitudes and Behavior, 2nd Annual Workshop on Economics and Information Security -WEIS, 2003. ,
Platform wars come to social media, Communications of the ACM, vol.54, issue.4, pp.31-33, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1145/1924421.1924433
Vertrauensinfrastruktur und Privatheit alsökonomische als¨alsökonomische Fragestellung: Internet Privacy -Eine multidisziplinäre Bestandsaufnahme/A Multidisciplinary Analysis, 2012. ,
Type Indeterminacy in Privacy Decisions: The Privacy Paradox Revisited, Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Quantum Interaction, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-35659-9_14
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, 1957. ,
Privacy and Freedom, 1967. ,
Design Science Research in Information Systems, MIS quarterly, vol.28, pp.75-105, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8_2
Addressing the privacy paradox by expanded privacy awareness the example of context-aware services Privacy and Identity Management for Life, Volume IFIP AICT, pp.275-283, 2010. ,
E-privacy in 2nd generation ecommerce: privacy preferences versus actual behavior, Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on Electronic Commerce, pp.38-47, 2001. ,
The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization, MIS quarterly, pp.13-28, 2006. ,
The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors, Journal of Consumer Affairs, vol.14, issue.1 and 2, pp.100-126, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x
An empirical comparison of methods for measuring consumers??? willingness to pay, Marketing Letters, vol.39, issue.2, pp.137-149, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s11002-006-5147-x
How Should Consumers' Willingness to Pay Be Measured? An Empirical Comparison of State-of-the-Art Approaches, Journal of Marketing Research, vol.48, issue.1, pp.172-184, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1509/jmkr.48.1.172
Investigating the value of privacy in online social networks: Conjoint analysis, Proceeding of ICIS, 2009. ,
Unwillingness to pay for privacy: A field experiment, Economics Letters, vol.117, issue.1, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.077
On the value of information -What Facebook users are willing to pay, Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Information Systems, 2012. ,
Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method, Behavioral Science, vol.59, issue.3, p.226232, 1964. ,
DOI : 10.1002/bs.3830090304
What Is Privacy Worth?, The Journal of Legal Studies, vol.42, issue.2, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1086/671754
Auktionen versus Lotterien: Ein empirischer Vergleich zur Messung von Zahlungsbereitschaften, Die Betriebswirtschaft, vol.67, pp.22-40, 2007. ,
Ordering effects in nested 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' contingent valuation designs, Ecological Economics, vol.45, issue.2, pp.255-270, 2003. ,
Order effects in sequential measurements of non-commuting psychological observables, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol.56, issue.4, pp.274-280, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jmp.2012.06.003
Distal order effects in stated preference surveys, Ecological Economics, vol.70, issue.6, pp.1101-1108, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.018
On visible choice sets and scope sensitivity, Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00057-3
The causes of order effects in contingent valuation surveys: An experimental investigation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.56, issue.2, pp.195-206, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2007.12.005
The Role of Question Order and Respondent Experience in Contingent-Valuation Studies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.25, issue.1, pp.80-99, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1993.1034
Valuation of health changes with the contingent valuation method: A test of scope and question order effects, Health Economics, vol.5, issue.6, pp.531-541, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199611)5:6<531::AID-HEC235>3.0.CO;2-J
Attribute order and product familiarity effects in decision tasks using conjoint analysis, International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol.8, issue.2, pp.113-124, 1991. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0167-8116(91)90019-4
Three kinds of order effects in choice-based conjoint analysis, Marketing Letters, vol.53, issue.2, pp.165-172, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF00994106
Die Echokammer Abstrakt: Die grosse Gemeinschaft, W.I.R.E. Collegium Helveticum, vol.9, pp.25-31, 2012. ,