O. Lindland, G. Sindre, and A. Sølvberg, Understanding quality in conceptual modeling, IEEE Software, vol.11, issue.2, pp.42-49, 1994.
DOI : 10.1109/52.268955

J. Krogstie, G. Sindre, and H. Jørgensen, Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.40, issue.5, pp.91-102, 2006.
DOI : 10.1145/253769.253801

D. Moody, G. Sindre, T. Brasethvik, and A. Sølvberg, Evaluating the Quality of Process Models: Empirical Testing of a Quality Framework, Conceptual Modeling -ER 2002, 21st International Conference on Conceptual Modeling Proceedings. Volume 2503 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp.380-396, 2002.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-45816-6_36

J. Mendling, H. A. Reijers, and J. Recker, Activity labeling in process modeling: Empirical insights and recommendations, Information Systems, vol.35, issue.4, pp.467-482, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.is.2009.03.009

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.228.6774

B. Silver, BPMN Method and Style, with BPMN Implementer's Guide, 2011.

T. Allweyer, BPMN 2.0 -Business Process Model and Notation, 2009.

H. Leopold, S. Smirnov, and J. Mendling, On the refactoring of activity labels in business process models, Information Systems, vol.37, issue.5, pp.443-459, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.is.2012.01.004

J. Mendling, Empirical Studies in Process Model Verification. LNCS Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency II, Special Issue on Concurrency in Process-Aware Information Systems, pp.208-224, 2009.

M. Rosemann, Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part A, Business Process Management Journal, vol.12, issue.2, pp.249-254, 2006.
DOI : 10.1108/14637150610657567

M. Rosemann, Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part B, Business Process Management Journal, vol.12, issue.3, pp.377-384, 2006.
DOI : 10.1108/14637150610668024

K. Sarshar and P. Loos, Comparing the Control-Flow of EPC and Petri Net from the End-User Perspective, Business Process Management, 3rd International Conference, BPM 2005, Proceedings, pp.434-439, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/11538394_36

J. Hahn and J. Kim, Why are some diagrams easier to work with? effects of diagrammatic representation on the cognitive integration process of systems analysis and design, ACMTCHI: ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol.6, 1999.

R. Agarwal, P. De, and A. Sinha, Comprehending object and process models: an empirical study, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.25, issue.4, pp.541-556, 1999.
DOI : 10.1109/32.799953

R. Weber, Ontological Foundations of Information Systems. Coopers & Lybrand and the Accounting Association of Australia and New Zealand, 1997.

J. Recker, M. Rosemann, P. F. Green, and M. Indulska, Do ontological deficiencies in modeling grammars matter?, MIS Quarterly, vol.35, issue.1, pp.57-79, 2011.

D. L. Moody, The “Physics” of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.35, issue.6, pp.756-779, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/TSE.2009.67

K. Figl, J. Mendling, and M. Strembeck, The influence of notational deficiencies on process model comprehension, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2012.

M. L. Rosa, A. H. Ter-hofstede, P. Wohed, H. A. Reijers, J. Mendling et al., Managing Process Model Complexity via Concrete Syntax Modifications, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol.7, issue.2, pp.255-265, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/TII.2011.2124467

H. A. Reijers, T. Freytag, J. Mendling, and A. Eckleder, Syntax highlighting in business process models, Decision Support Systems, vol.51, issue.3, pp.339-349, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.013

T. Moher, D. Mak, B. Blumenthal, and L. Leventhal, Comparing the Comprehensibility of Textual and Graphical Programs: The Case of Petri Nets, Empirical Studies of Programmers: Fifth Workshop: Papers Presented at the Fifth Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programmers, pp.137-161, 1993.

H. Purchase, Which aesthetic has the greatest effect on human understanding?, pp.248-261, 1997.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-63938-1_67

T. Mccabe, A Complexity Measure, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.2, issue.4, pp.308-320, 1976.
DOI : 10.1109/TSE.1976.233837

S. Chidamber and C. Kemerer, A metrics suite for object oriented design, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.20, issue.6, pp.476-493, 1994.
DOI : 10.1109/32.295895

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.101.2372

N. Fenton and S. Pfleeger, Software Metrics. A Rigorous and Practical Approach, PWS, 1997.

G. Lee and J. M. Yoon, An empirical study on complexity metrics of Petri nets, Microelectronics Reliability, vol.32, issue.9, pp.323-329, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/0026-2714(92)90643-Y

M. Nissen, Redesigning Reengineering through Measurement-Driven Inference, MIS Quarterly, vol.22, issue.4, pp.509-534, 1998.
DOI : 10.2307/249553

URL : http://elibrary.aisnet.org/Default.aspx?url=http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2330&context=misq

S. Morasca, Measuring attributes of concurrent software specifications in Petri nets, Proceedings Sixth International Software Metrics Symposium (Cat. No.PR00403), pp.100-110, 1999.
DOI : 10.1109/METRIC.1999.809731

J. Cardoso, Evaluating Workflows and Web Process Complexity, Future Strategies, pp.284-290, 2005.

J. Cardoso, Process control-flow complexity metric: An empirical validation, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC'06), pp.167-173, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/SCC.2006.82

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.97.3714

G. Canfora, F. García, M. Piattini, F. Ruiz, and C. Visaggio, A family of experiments to validate metrics for software process models, Journal of Systems and Software, vol.77, issue.2, pp.113-129, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jss.2004.11.007

E. R. Aguilar, F. García, F. Ruiz, and M. Piattini, An exploratory experiment to validate measures for business process models, First International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 2007.

I. Vanderfeesten, H. Reijers, J. Mendling, W. Aalst, and J. Cardoso, On a Quest for Good Process Models: The Cross-Connectivity Metric, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.5074, pp.480-494, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-69534-9_36

J. Vanhatalo, H. Völzer, and F. Leymann, Faster and More Focused Control-Flow Analysis for Business Process Models Through SESE Decomposition, Service-Oriented Computing -ICSOC 2007, Fifth International Conference Proceedings. Volume 4749 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp.43-55, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-74974-5_4

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.94.3916

W. Aalst and K. Lassen, Translating unstructured workflow processes to readable BPEL: Theory and implementation, Information and Software Technology, vol.50, issue.3, pp.131-159, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.infsof.2006.11.004

H. A. Reijers, J. Mendling, and R. M. Dijkman, Human and automatic modularizations of process models to enhance their comprehension, Information Systems, vol.36, issue.5, pp.881-897, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.is.2011.03.003

J. Mendling, H. Verbeek, B. Dongen, W. Aalst, and G. Neumann, Detection and prediction of errors in EPCs of the SAP reference model, Data & Knowledge Engineering, vol.64, issue.1, pp.312-329, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.datak.2007.06.019

J. Mendling, Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction, and Guidelines for Correctness, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-89224-3

H. A. Reijers and J. Mendling, A Study Into the Factors That Influence the Understandability of Business Process Models, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, vol.41, issue.3, pp.449-462, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/TSMCA.2010.2087017

J. Mendling, M. Strembeck, and J. Recker, Factors of process model comprehension???Findings from a series of experiments, Decision Support Systems, vol.53, issue.1, pp.195-206, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.dss.2011.12.013

J. Becker, M. Rosemann, and C. Uthmann, Guidelines of Business Process Modeling, Business Process Management. Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies, pp.30-49, 2000.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2575.1995.tb00108.x

J. Mendling, L. Sánchez-gonzález, F. García, and M. L. Rosa, Thresholds for error probability measures of business process models, Journal of Systems and Software, vol.85, issue.5, pp.1188-1197, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jss.2012.01.017

D. Hosmer and S. Lemeshow, Applied Logistic Regression, 2000.
DOI : 10.1002/0471722146

M. Zweig and G. Campbell, Receiver-operating characteristic (roc) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine, Clinical chemistry, vol.39, issue.4, pp.561-577, 1993.

D. Dean, J. Lee, R. Orwig, and D. Vogel, Technological Support for Group Process Modeling, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol.10, issue.3, pp.43-63, 1994.
DOI : 10.1109/TSE.1977.229900

M. Rosemann and M. Muehlen, Evaluation of Workflow Management Systems - A Meta Model Approach, Australasian Journal of Information Systems, vol.6, issue.1, pp.103-116, 1998.
DOI : 10.3127/ajis.v6i1.322

C. Rolland, L'E-Lyee: coupling L'Ecritoire and LyeeALL, Information and Software Technology, vol.44, issue.3, pp.185-194, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-5849(02)00006-X

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00706997

M. Fowler, K. Beck, J. Brant, W. Opdyke, and D. Roberts, Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-45672-4_31

B. Weber, M. Reichert, J. Mendling, and H. A. Reijers, Refactoring large process model repositories, Computers in Industry, vol.62, issue.5, pp.467-486, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.compind.2010.12.012

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.228.6372

A. Polyvyanyy, L. García-bañuelos, and M. Dumas, Structuring acyclic process models, Information Systems, vol.37, issue.6, pp.518-538, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.is.2011.10.005

M. L. Rosa, P. Wohed, J. Mendling, A. H. Ter-hofstede, H. A. Reijers et al., Managing Process Model Complexity Via Abstract Syntax Modifications, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol.7, issue.4, pp.614-629, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/TII.2011.2166795

B. Kiepuszewski, A. Hofstede, and C. Bussler, On structured workflow modelling, Advanced Information Systems Engineering, 12th International Conference CAiSE Proceedings. Volume 1789 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp.431-445, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-36926-1_19

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.85.2336

M. Dumas, M. L. Rosa, J. Mendling, R. Mäesalu, H. A. Reijers et al., Understanding Business Process Models: The Costs and Benefits of Structuredness, CAiSE. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.7328, pp.31-46, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-31095-9_3

H. Leopold, S. Smirnov, and J. Mendling, On the refactoring of activity labels in business process models, Information Systems, vol.37, issue.5, pp.443-459, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.is.2012.01.004