A. R. Hevner, A three-cycle view of design science research, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol.19, issue.2, pp.87-92, 2007.

J. Iivari, A paradigmatic analysis of information systems as a design science, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol.19, issue.2, pp.39-64, 2007.

S. T. March and G. F. Smith, Design and natural science research on information technology, Decision Support Systems, vol.15, issue.4, pp.251-266, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2

S. Purao, C. Y. Baldwin, A. Hevner, V. C. Story, J. Pries-heje et al., The Sciences of Design: Observations on an Emerging Field. Working paper, 2008.

R. Baskerville, K. Lyytinen, V. Sambamurthy, and D. Straub, A response to the design-oriented information systems research memorandum, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.19, issue.5, pp.11-15, 2011.
DOI : 10.1057/ejis.2010.43

A. R. Hevner, S. T. March, J. Park, R. , and S. , Design Science Research in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly, issue.281, pp.75-105, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8_2

S. Gregor and D. Jones, The Anatomy of a Design Theory, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol.8, issue.5, pp.312-335, 2007.

B. Kuechler and V. Vaishnavi, On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.47, issue.2, pp.489-504, 2008.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.47.2.349

R. Baskerville, M. Kaul, and V. Storey, Unpacking the Duality of Design Science, ICIS 2011 Proceedings. Paper 10, 2011.

W. Orlikowski and C. Iacono, Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the ???IT??? in IT Research???A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact, Information Systems Research, vol.12, issue.2, pp.121-134, 2001.
DOI : 10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700

T. G. Gill and A. R. Hevner, A Fitness-Utility Model for Design Science Research, Proceedings of DESRIST 2011, pp.237-252, 2011.
DOI : 10.1145/2499962.2499963

T. Winograd and F. Flores, On understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design, Artificial Intelligence, vol.31, issue.2, 1986.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(87)90026-9

P. Ehn, The Art and Science of Designing Computer Artefacts, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol.1, issue.1 3, 1989.

N. Cross, Designerly ways of knowing, Design Studies, vol.3, issue.4, pp.49-55, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0

K. Krippendorff, The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design, 2006.
DOI : 10.4324/9780203299951

J. Sjöström, Designing Information System ? A pragmatic account Doctoral Dissertation, 2010.

S. Gherardi, Introduction: The Critical Power of the `Practice Lens', Management Learning, vol.40, issue.2, pp.115-128, 2009.
DOI : 10.1177/1350507608101225

T. R. Schatski, Introduction, Human Affairs, vol.17, issue.2, 2001.
DOI : 10.2478/v10023-007-0009-6

A. Giddens, The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, 1984.

W. Orlikowski, The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization science, pp.398-427, 1992.

G. Goldkuhl, Design theories in information systems-a need for multi-grounding, Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, vol.6, issue.2, pp.59-72, 2004.

G. Desanctis, The Social Life of Information Systems Research? -A Response to Benbasat and Zmud's Call for Returning to the IT Artifact, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol.4, issue.7, pp.360-376, 2003.

J. Dewey, Logic: The theory of inquiry, 1938.

J. Venable, A framework for Design Science research activities, 2006 Information Resources Management Association International Conference, pp.184-187, 2006.

S. Gregor and A. Hevner, (in press) Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact, paper currently under journal review

R. S. Kaplan and D. Norton, Balanced Scorecard, Harvard Business Review, pp.71-80, 1992.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-8349-9320-5_12

M. Helfert, G. Costello, and B. Donnellan, The Case for Design Science Utility - Evaluation of Design Science Artefacts within the IT Capability Maturity Framework, 2012.

B. Donnellan and M. Helfert, The IT-CMF: A Practical Application of Design Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Publisher Springer, pp.1611-3349, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_43

G. Bateson, Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology, 1972.
DOI : 10.7208/chicago/9780226924601.001.0001

W. Orlikowski, Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations, Organization Science, vol.11, issue.4, pp.404-428, 2000.
DOI : 10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600

P. J. Ågerfalk, Investigating actability dimensions: a language/action perspective on criteria for information systems evaluation, Interacting with Computers, vol.16, issue.5, pp.957-988, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.intcom.2004.05.002

P. Ehn, Review of The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design, Artifact, vol.1, issue.1, pp.59-63, 2007.

M. Polanyi, The Tacit Dimension, 1966.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-0-7506-9718-7.50010-X

G. Walsham, The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research, Information Systems Research, vol.6, issue.4, pp.376-394, 1995.
DOI : 10.1287/isre.6.4.376

H. K. Klein and M. D. Myers, A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly, vol.23, issue.1, pp.67-93, 1999.
DOI : 10.2307/249410

D. Sanctis, G. Poole, and M. S. , Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory, Organization Science, pp.121-147, 1994.

R. Trigg and S. Bødker, From implementation to design, Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work , CSCW '94, 1994.
DOI : 10.1145/192844.192869