G. Crabtree and A. Malozemoff, Science for Energy Technology: Strengthening the Link between Basic Research and Industry, U.S. Department of Energy, p.pdf, 2010.

C. J. Roy and W. L. Oberkampf, A comprehensive framework for verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification in scientific computing, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol.200, issue.25-28, pp.2131-2144, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cma.2011.03.016

W. L. Oberkampf and C. J. Roy, Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing, 2010.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511760396

M. Fluss, W. E. King, G. Bench, V. Bulatov, D. Caro et al., Workshop on Science Applications of a Triple Beam Capability for Advanced Nuclear Energy Materials, p.triplebeamworkshop, 2009.

U. S. Doe, Viability Assessment of a Repository at Yucca Mountain. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, 1998.

L. Sandia-national, Total System Performance Assessment Model/Analysis for the License Application. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, p.1, 2008.

J. C. Helton, M. Martell, and M. S. Tierney, Characterization of subjective uncertainty in the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.69, issue.1-3, pp.191-204, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00032-6

R. P. Rechard and M. S. Tierney, Assignment of probability distributions for parameters in the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Part 1: description of process, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.88, issue.1, pp.1-32, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ress.2004.07.011

R. P. Rechard and M. S. Tierney, Assignment of probability distributions for parameters in the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Part 2. Application of process, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.88, issue.1, pp.33-80, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ress.2004.07.012

S. M. Myers and W. R. Wampler, The Science of QASPR (Qualification Alternatives to the Sandia Pulsed Reactor) in Sandia's Physical, Chemical, and Nano Sciences Center (PCNSC) Sandia National Laboratories, pp.2008-7810, 2008.

W. Q. Meeker and L. A. Escobar, Pitfalls of accelerated testing, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol.47, issue.2, pp.114-118, 1998.
DOI : 10.1109/24.722271

W. Nelson, Accelerated Testing: Statistical Models, Test Plans and Data Analyses, 1990.
DOI : 10.1002/9780470316795

W. L. Oberkampf and T. G. Trucano, Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol.38, issue.3, pp.209-272, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00005-2
URL : http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc734067/m2/1/high_res_d/793406.pdf

D. G. Cacuci and M. Ionescu-bujor, Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis, Data Assimilation , and Predictive Best-Estimate Model Calibration Handbook of Nuclear Engineering, 2010.

D. Higdon, R. Klein, M. Anderson, M. Berliner, C. Covey et al., Uncertainty Quantification and Error Analysis, Scientific Grand Challenges in National Security: the Role of Computing at the Extreme Scale, pp.121-142, 2009.

M. C. Kennedy and A. O-'hagan, Bayesian calibration of computer models, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), vol.63, issue.3, pp.425-450, 2001.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-9868.00294

M. S. Eldred and J. Burkardt, Comparison of Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos and Stochastic Collocation Methods for Uncertainty Quantification, 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, pp.2009-2976, 2009.
DOI : 10.2514/6.2009-976

H. N. Najm, Uncertainty Quantification and Polynomial Chaos Techniques in Computational Fluid Dynamics, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol.41, issue.1, pp.35-52, 2009.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.fluid.010908.165248

S. Ferson, W. L. Oberkampf, and L. Ginzburg, Model validation and predictive capability for the thermal challenge problem, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol.197, issue.29-32, pp.2408-2430, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cma.2007.07.030

V. Kumar, T. S. Krishnamurti, T. N. Fiorino, M. Nagata, and M. , Multimodel Superensemble Forecasting of Tropical Cyclones in the Pacific, Monthly Weather Review, vol.131, issue.3, pp.574-583, 2003.
DOI : 10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<0574:MSFOTC>2.0.CO;2

T. N. Krishnamurti, C. M. Kishtawal, T. E. Larow, D. R. Bachiochi, Z. Zhang et al., Improved Weather and Seasonal Climate Forecasts from Multimodel Superensemble, Science, vol.285, issue.5433, pp.1548-1550, 1999.
DOI : 10.1126/science.285.5433.1548
URL : http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/285/5433/1548.full.pdf

J. T. Oden and S. Prudhomme, Control of modeling error in calibration and validation processes for predictive stochastic models, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol.198, issue.3, pp.262-272, 2011.
DOI : 10.1002/nme.3038

Z. G. Qian, C. C. Seepersad, V. R. Joseph, J. K. Allen, and C. F. Wu, Building Surrogate Models Based on Detailed and Approximate Simulations, Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.128, issue.4, pp.668-677, 2006.
DOI : 10.1115/1.2179459
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.215.7844

G. King and L. C. Zeng, The Dangers of Extreme Counterfactuals, Political Analysis, vol.79, issue.02, pp.131-159, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s003579900006

C. Tong, PSUADE User's Manual (Version 1.2.0), p.407882, 2009.

T. G. Theofanous, On the proper formulation of safety goals and assessment of safety margins for rare and high-consequence hazards, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol.54, issue.2-3, pp.243-257, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00079-8

E. Kalnay, Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation, and Predictability, 2003.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511802270
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.88.5725