C. Aschwanden, Science Isn't Broken. It's just a hell of a lot harder than we give it credit for. FiveirthyEight. Retrieved from hhps, 2015.

M. Baker, Statisticians issue warning over misuse of P values, Nature, vol.531, issue.7593, p.531, 2016.
DOI : 10.1038/nature.2016.19503

M. Bakker, A. Van-dijk, and J. M. Wicherts, The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol.14, issue.6, pp.543-554, 2012.
DOI : 10.1037/a0024348

S. Buranyi, The hi-tech war on science fraud. e Guardian. Retrieved from hhps, 2017.

C. Collberg, T. Proebsting, G. Moraila, A. Shankaran, Z. Shi et al., Measuring reproducibility in computer systems research, 2014.

C. Collberg, T. Proebsting, and A. M. Warren, Repeatability and benefaction in computer systems research ? a study and a modest proposal, 2015.

D. Colquhoun, An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values, Royal Society Open Science, vol.8, issue.48, pp.140216-140216, 2014.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002822

D. W. Cromey, Digital Images Are Data: And Should Be Treated as Such, Methods in molecular biology, pp.1-27, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-62703-056-4_1

URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4210356

G. Cumming, Mind your conndence interval: How statistics skew research results. e Conversation. Retrieved from hhps://theconversation.com/mind-your-conndence-interval-how-statistics-skew-research-results-3186, 2012.

G. Cumming, Understanding the new statistics: EEect sizes, conndence intervals, and meta-analysis, pp.Rout- ledge, 2012.

I. De-groote, L. G. Flink, R. Abbas, S. M. Bello, L. Burgia et al., New genetic and morphological evidence suggests a single hoaxer created ???Piltdown man???, Royal Society Open Science, vol.16, issue.Odontol. Sect., 2016.
DOI : 10.1002/evan.20141

T. Dorigo, Fighting plagiarism in scientiic papers Retrieved from hhp://www.science20.com/a quantum diaries survivor, p.154460, 2015.

S. Epskamp and M. B. Nuijten, Statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. R Package Retrieved from hhp Publishing: The peer-review scam, Nature, issue.7528, pp.515-480, 1038.

S. T. Finske and B. , A call to change science's culture of shaming Association for Psychological Science Retrieved from hhp://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/a-call-to-change-sciences-culture-of-shaming Grant Vaccine fraudster gets jail time. e Scientist. Retrieved from hhp://www.the-scientist, 2015.

H. Haller, S. Krauss, C. H. Hartgerink, R. C. Van-aert, M. B. Nuijten et al., Misinterpretations of signiicance: A problem students share with their teachers? MPR-online Retrieved from hhps://www.dgps.de/fachgruppen/methoden/mpr-online/issue16/art1/article Distributions of p-values smaller than .05 in psychology: What is going on? PeerJ, 1935.

C. J. Haug, Peer-Review Fraud ??? Hacking the Scientific Publication Process, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.373, issue.25, pp.2393-2395, 2015.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJMp1512330

M. Hendricks, Scientiic integrity in the age of photoshop Retrieved from hhp://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/institute basic biomedical sciences/news events/articles and stories/employment/2011 01 scientiic integrity An eecient detection algorithm for copy-move forgery, 10th Asia Joint Conference on Information Security, 2011.

K. Kennedy, This dog sits on seven editorial boards. Atlas Obscura. Retrieved from hhp, 2017.

M. Lecoutre, J. Poitevineau, and B. Lecoutre, Even statisticians are not immune to misinterpretations of Null Hypothesis Significance Tests, International Journal of Psychology, vol.25, issue.1, pp.37-45, 2003.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00556.x

T. C. Long, M. Errami, A. C. George, Z. Sun, and H. R. Garner, SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY: Responding to Possible Plagiarism, Science, vol.323, issue.5919, pp.1293-1294, 2009.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1167408

D. L. Longo and J. M. Drazen, Data Sharing, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.374, issue.3, pp.276-277, 1038.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJMe1516564

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01112977

&. Rougier and @. Timmer, Simple Rules for Scientific Fraud & Misconduct, 2017.

J. Matejka and G. Fitzmaurice, Same stats, diierent graphs, Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems -CHI '17, 2017.
DOI : 10.1145/3025453.3025912

G. Miller, A scientist's nightmare: Sooware problem leads to ve retractions, Science, issue.5807, p.314, 2006.
DOI : 10.1126/science.314.5807.1856

. Neuroskeptic, Science has a plagiarism problem Retrieved from hhp, 2017.

M. B. Nuijten, B. ]. Michèle, C. H. Hartgerink, M. A. Van-assen, S. Epskamp et al., The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985???2013), Behavior Research Methods, vol.6, issue.11, pp.1205-1226, 1985.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0026828

R. L. Raschke and P. J. Steinbart, Mitigating the Effects of Misleading Graphs on Decisions by Educating Users about the Principles of Graph Design, Journal of Information Systems, vol.22, issue.2, pp.23-52, 2008.
DOI : 10.2308/jis.2008.22.2.23

D. G. Roche, R. Lanfear, S. A. Binning, T. M. Haa, L. E. Schwanz et al., Troubleshooting Public Data Archiving: Suggestions to Increase Participation, PLoS Biology, vol.494, issue.1, 2014.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001779.g002

URL : http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001779

M. Rossner and K. M. Yamada, What's in a picture? The temptation of image manipulation, The Journal of Cell Biology, vol.166, issue.1, pp.11-15, 2004.
DOI : 10.1083/jcb.200312069

N. P. Rougier, M. Droeeboom, and P. E. Bourne, Ten simple rules for beeer gures, PLoS Computational Biology, vol.10, issue.9, 2014.

F. D. Schönbrodt, Train your p-hacking skills! Retrieved from hhp://shinyapps, 2015.

C. Shen and B. Björk, ???Predatory??? open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics, BMC Medicine, vol.512, issue.1, 2015.
DOI : 10.1038/512017a

A. Silver, Pay-to-view blacklist of predatory journals set to launch, Nature, 2017.
DOI : 10.1038/nature.2017.22090

J. P. Simmons, L. D. Nelson, and U. Simonsohn, False-Positive Psychology, Psychological Science, vol.100, issue.11, pp.1359-1366, 2011.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1979.tb00202.x

P. Sorokowski, E. Kulczycki, A. Sorokowska, and K. Pisanski, Predatory journals recruit fake editor, Nature, vol.543, issue.7646, pp.481-48310543481, 1038.
DOI : 10.1038/543481a

URL : http://www.nature.com:80/polopoly_fs/1.21662!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/543481a.pdf

T. Stigbrand, Retraction Note to multiple articles in Tumor Biology, Tumor Biology, pp.10-1007, 2017.
DOI : 10.1007/s13277-017-5487-6

URL : https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs13277-017-5487-6.pdf

C. Straumsheim, No more 'beall's list'. Inside Higher Ed Retrieved from hhpslibrarians-list-predatory-journals-reportedly-removed-due-threats-and-politics, 2017.

J. Timmer, Epic fraud: How to succeed in science (without doing any) Ars Technica. Retrieved from hhps://arstechnica. com/science/2012/07/epic-fraud-how-to-succeed-in-science-without-doing-any, 2012.

R. Trebino, How to publish a scientiic comment in 123 easy steps Retrieved from hhp://frog.gatech.edu/Pubs/How- to-Publish-a-Scientiic-Comment-in-123-Easy-Steps, Anatomy of a Fraud: Symmetry and Dance, 2009.

B. Vastag, Cancer Fraud Case Stuns Research Community, Prompts Reflection on Peer Review Process, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol.98, issue.6, pp.374-376, 2006.
DOI : 10.1093/jnci/djj118

H. Wainer, How to display data badly, American Statistician, vol.38, issue.2, pp.137-14710483186, 1984.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4612-2282-8_2

R. L. Wasserstein and N. A. Lazar, -Values: Context, Process, and Purpose, The American Statistician, vol.50, issue.2, pp.129-133, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61174-9

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01314294

C. White, Software makes it easier for journals to spot image manipulation, BMJ, vol.334, issue.7594, pp.607-607, 2007.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.39160.666204.BD

URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1832049

M. D. Wilkinson, M. Dumontier, I. J. Aalbersberg, G. Appleton, M. Axton et al., The FAIR guiding principles for scientiic data management and stewardship, 2016.
DOI : 10.1038/sdata.2016.18

URL : http://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18