Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

Ternary Dialectical Informatics

Abstract : Modern binary informatics with its so-called “classical” two-valued logic admits to create an artificial intellect and suppresses the natural intellect of students and other thinking people. Logic that based on dogmatic law of the excluded middle is incompatible with dialectical principle of opposition coexistence. Such logic is deprived of fundamental logical relation – the content consequence, and then cannot reach a conclusion. Aristotle’s syllogistics includes the content consequence as common affirmative premise “All x are y”. However, binarity misinterprets it as a paradoxical material implication that is not a relation at all. Lewis Carroll’s “Symbolic logic” correctly represented syllogistics, but it is not intelligible for modern binary logic. Our paper reveals the essence of content consequence; it explains Carroll’s intentional judgments and syllogistic relations submitted to opposite coexistence.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [9 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Hal Ifip Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Tuesday, July 25, 2017 - 11:42:48 AM
Last modification on : Wednesday, September 4, 2019 - 5:36:02 PM


Files produced by the author(s)


Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License



Nikolay Petrovich Brusentsov, Julia Sergeevna Vladimirova. Ternary Dialectical Informatics. 1st Soviet and Russian Computing (SoRuCom), Jul 2006, Petrozavodsk, Russia. pp.81-88, ⟨10.1007/978-3-642-22816-2_11⟩. ⟨hal-01568386⟩



Record views


Files downloads