On achieving high accuracy and reliability in the calculation of relative protein-ligand binding affinities, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.116, issue.2, pp.1937-1942, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1063/1.1472510
FEW: A workflow tool for free energy calculations of ligand binding, Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol.130, issue.11, pp.965-973, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ja0779250
Accurate and Reliable Prediction of Relative Ligand Binding Potency in Prospective Drug Discovery by Way of a Modern Free-Energy Calculation Protocol and Force Field, Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol.137, issue.7, pp.2695-2703, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ja512751q
Comparative Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions for Molecular Docking, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol.46, issue.12, pp.2287-2303, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1021/jm0203783
Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: Methods and applications, Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery, vol.3, issue.11, pp.935-949, 2004. ,
A Critical Assessment of Docking Programs and Scoring Functions, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol.49, issue.20, pp.495912-5931, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1021/jm050362n
Virtual screening strategies in drug discovery, Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, vol.11, issue.5, pp.494-502, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.08.033
Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on a Diverse Test Set, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.49, issue.4, pp.1079-1093, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci9000053
CSAR Benchmark Exercise of 2010: Combined Evaluation Across All Submitted Scoring Functions, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.51, issue.9, pp.2115-2131, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci200269q
URL : http://doi.org/10.1021/ci200269q
Csar benchmark exercise 2011?2012: Evaluation of results from docking and relative ranking of blinded congeneric series, J. Chem. Inf. Model, issue.8, pp.531853-1870, 2013. ,
Development of the Knowledge-Based and Empirical Combined Scoring Algorithm (KECSA) To Score Protein???Ligand Interactions, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.53, issue.5, pp.1073-1083, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci300619x
Classification of Current Scoring Functions, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.55, issue.3, pp.475-482, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci500731a
Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on an Updated Benchmark: 2. Evaluation Methods and General Results, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.54, issue.6, pp.1717-1736, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci500081m
Classification of Current Scoring Functions, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.55, issue.3, pp.475-482, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci500731a
Charmm: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations, J. Comput. Chem, vol.4, issue.2, pp.187-217, 1983. ,
Development and Testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids, Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol.118, issue.45, pp.11225-11236, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ja9621760
Dock 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des, vol.15, issue.5, pp.411-428, 2001. ,
The amber biomolecular simulation programs, J. Comput. Chem, vol.26, issue.16, pp.1668-1688, 2005. ,
GROMACS 4:?? Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, vol.4, issue.3, pp.435-447, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ct700301q
URL : http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:588952/component/escidoc:588951/412029.pdf
Validation and Use of the MM-PBSA Approach for Drug Discovery, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol.48, issue.12, pp.4040-4048, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1021/jm049081q
Toward On-The-Fly Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical (QM/MM) Docking: Development and Benchmark of a Scoring Function, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.54, issue.11, pp.3137-3152, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci5004152
The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, vol.47, issue.3, pp.243-256, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0005-2795(81)90071-4
Empirical scoring functions: I. the development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des, vol.11, issue.5, pp.425-445, 1997. ,
Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, vol.16, issue.1, pp.11-26, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1016357811882
Glide:?? A New Approach for Rapid, Accurate Docking and Scoring. 1. Method and Assessment of Docking Accuracy, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol.47, issue.7, pp.471739-1749, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1021/jm0306430
Empirical Scoring Functions for Advanced Protein???Ligand Docking with PLANTS, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.49, issue.1, pp.84-96, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci800298z
Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on an Updated Benchmark: 1. Compilation of the Test Set, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.54, issue.6, pp.1700-1716, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci500080q
AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading, Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol.17, issue.2, pp.455-461, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jcc.21334
Vinardo: A Scoring Function Based on Autodock Vina Improves Scoring, Docking, and Virtual Screening, PLOS ONE, vol.9, issue.5, p.155183, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0155183.s006
URL : http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155183
Improving scoring-docking-screening powers of protein-ligand scoring functions using random forest, Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol.12, issue.4, pp.169-177, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1007999920146
A General and Fast Scoring Function for Protein???Ligand Interactions:?? A Simplified Potential Approach, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol.42, issue.5, pp.791-804, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1021/jm980536j
General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, vol.16, issue.2, pp.272-287, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci00057a005
Meanforce scoring functions for protein?ligand binding, Annu. Rep. Comput. Chem, vol.6, pp.280-296, 2010. ,
GOAP: A Generalized Orientation-Dependent, All-Atom Statistical Potential for Protein Structure Prediction, Biophysical Journal, vol.101, issue.8, pp.2043-2052, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.012
URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.012
Scoring and lessons learned with the csar benchmark using an improved iterative knowledgebased scoring function Dsx: a knowledge-based scoring function for the assessment of protein?ligand complexes, J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Inf. Model, vol.51, issue.910, pp.2097-2106, 2011. ,
Knowledge of Native Protein???Protein Interfaces Is Sufficient To Construct Predictive Models for the Selection of Binding Candidates, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.55, issue.10, pp.2242-55, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00372
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01229886
Incorporating specificity into optimization: evaluation of SPA using CSAR 2014 and CASF 2013 benchmarks, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, vol.133, issue.3 ,
DOI : 10.1021/ja202726y
Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions, Journal of Molecular Biology, vol.295, issue.2, pp.337-356, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3371
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.125.398
Inclusion of solvation and entropy in the knowledge? based scoring function for protein?ligand interactions, J. Chem. Inf. Model, vol.50, issue.2, pp.262-273, 2010. ,
Scoring functions for protein?ligand interactions. Protein-Ligand Interactions, First Edition, pp.237-263, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1002/9783527645947.ch12
A machine learning-based method to improve docking scoring functions and its application to drug repurposing, J. Chem. Inf. Model, vol.51, issue.2, pp.408-419, 2011. ,
: A Random Forest-Based Scoring Function for Improved Affinity Prediction of Protein???Ligand Complexes, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.53, issue.8 ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci400120b
ID-Score: A New Empirical Scoring Function Based on a Comprehensive Set of Descriptors Related to Protein???Ligand Interactions, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.53, issue.3, pp.592-600, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci300493w
Beware of Machine Learning-Based Scoring Functions???On the Danger of Developing Black Boxes, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.54, issue.10, pp.2807-2815, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci500406k
Virtual Screening: Principles, Challenges, and Practical Guidelines, 1002. ,
DOI : 10.1002/9783527633326
Comparison of several molecular docking programs: Pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy, J. Chem. Inf. Model, vol.49, issue.6, pp.1455-1474, 2009. ,
Combined Application of Cheminformatics- and Physical Force Field-Based Scoring Functions Improves Binding Affinity Prediction for CSAR Data Sets, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.51, issue.9, pp.2027-2035, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci200146e
A benchmark exercise using unpublished data from pharma, J. Chem. Inf. Model, 2014. ,
Predicting Binding Poses and Affinities in the CSAR 2013???2014 Docking Exercises Using the Knowledge-Based Convex-PL Potential, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.56, issue.6, pp.1053-1062, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00339
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01258022
Prediction of homo-and hetero-protein complexes by ab-initio and template-based docking: a CASP-CAPRI experiment, Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf, 2016. ,
Simon Marillet, and Fr'ed'eric Cazals Predicting binding affinities for protein -ligand complexes in the 2015 d3r grand challenge using a physical model with a ridge regression parameter estimation, J. Comput.- Aided Mol. Des ,
Docking of small molecules to farnesoid X receptors using AutoDock Vina with the Convex-PL potential: lessons learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, vol.21, issue.4, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.12.123
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01591157
Dassault Systemes. Ref. Dassault Systemes BIOVIA, Discovery Studio Modeling Environment, 2016. ,
Molecular recognition of the inhibitor ag-1343 by hiv-1 protease: conformationally flexible docking by evolutionary programming, Chem. Biol, vol.2, issue.5, pp.317-324, 1995. ,
Scoring noncovalent proteinligand interactions: a continuous differentiable function tuned to compute binding affinities, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des, vol.10, issue.5, pp.427-440, 1996. ,
Effect of ligand volume correction on PMF scoring, Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol.11, issue.4, pp.418-425, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1002/1096-987X(200103)22:4<418::AID-JCC1012>3.0.CO;2-3
Prediction of binding constants of protein ligands: a fast method for the prioritization of hits obtained from de novo design or 3d database search programs, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, vol.12, issue.4, pp.309-309, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1007999920146
Variability in docking success rates due to dataset preparation ,
The generalized Born/volume integral implicit solvent model: Estimation of the free energy of hydration using London dispersion instead of atomic surface area, 63] Junichi Goto, Ryoichi Kataoka, Hajime Muta, and Noriaki Hirayama. Asedock-docking based on alpha spheres and excluded volumes, pp.1693-1698, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1039/p29940001777
An iterative knowledge-based scoring function for protein?protein recognition, Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf, vol.72, issue.2, pp.557-579, 2008. ,
DARS (Decoys As the Reference State) Potentials for Protein-Protein Docking, Biophysical Journal, vol.95, issue.9, pp.4217-4227, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1529/biophysj.108.135814
Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins, J. Mol. Biol, vol.227, issue.3, pp.876-888, 1992. ,
Atomically detailed potentials to recognize native and approximate protein structures, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, vol.269, issue.4, pp.44-55, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1137/1.9781611971453
Optimal design of protein docking potentials: Efficiency and limitations, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, vol.280, issue.4, pp.970-981, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1110/ps.8.2.361
Predicting protein complex geometries with a neural network, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, vol.1, issue.4, pp.1026-1039, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1002/prot.22626
PEPSI-Dock: a detailed data-driven protein???protein interaction potential accelerated by polar Fourier correlation, Bioinformatics, vol.32, issue.17, pp.32-693, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw443
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01358645
The nature of statistical learning theory, 2000. ,
Convex Optimization, 2004. ,
A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp.1137-1145, 1995. ,
Convex optimization, 2004. ,
Estimation of dependences based on empirical data, Nauka, 1979. ,
An improved training algorithm for support vector machines, Neural Networks for Signal Processing VII. Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop, pp.276-285, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1109/NNSP.1997.622408
Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization, Advances in Kernel Methods, 1998. ,
RSVM: Reduced Support Vector Machines, Proceedings of the First SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pp.0-07, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1137/1.9781611972719.13
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.102.3640
Knodle: A Support Vector Machines-Based Automatic Perception of Organic Molecules from 3D Coordinates, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.56, issue.8, pp.1410-1419, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00512
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01381010
fconv: format conversion, manipulation and feature computation of molecular data, Bioinformatics, vol.27, issue.7, pp.1021-1022, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr055
The PDBbind Database: Methodologies And Updates The PDBbind Database: Collection of Binding Affinities for Protein-Ligand Complexes with Known Three-Dimensional Structures, Xueliang Fang, Yipin Lu, and Shaomeng Wang, pp.4111-4120, 2004. ,
Rapid determination of RMSDs corresponding to macromolecular rigid body motions, Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol.8, issue.12, pp.950-956, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0056645
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00952248
D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein???ligand pose and affinity predictions, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, vol.44, issue.9, pp.651-668, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1093/nar/gkv951
Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures, Protein Science, vol.12, issue.11, pp.2507-2524, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1074/jbc.272.2.701
Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction, Protein Science, vol.22, issue.11, pp.2714-2726, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1110/ps.0217002
An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction 1 1Edited by F. Cohen, Journal of Molecular Biology, vol.275, issue.5, pp.895-916, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1479
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.70.4101
BLAST+: architecture and applications, BMC Bioinformatics, vol.10, issue.1, p.421, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421
URL : https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1471-2105-10-421?site=bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com