Abstract : Usability ratings of a university website by 60 students were analysed together with participant’s self-ratings of their cognitive style. The degree of users’ “rational” as well as their “intuitive” style correlated with usability evaluation scores. In particular, self-reported rational ability was connected with evaluations of Controllability, intuitive ability was related to Helpfulness scores of the interface. Thinking style significantly affects usability ratings (explaining over 9% of the ratings’ variation), which has implications for evaluations across user groups.
Type de document :
Communication dans un congrès
Pedro Campos; Nicholas Graham; Joaquim Jorge; Nuno Nunes; Philippe Palanque; Marco Winckler. 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT), Sep 2011, Lisbon, Portugal. Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, LNCS-6949 (Part IV), pp.544-547, 2011, Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2011. 〈10.1007/978-3-642-23768-3_78〉
https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01596982
Contributeur : Hal Ifip
<>
Soumis le : jeudi 28 septembre 2017 - 10:22:33
Dernière modification le : mardi 10 octobre 2017 - 13:32:29
Document(s) archivé(s) le : vendredi 29 décembre 2017 - 15:00:01
Volker Thoma, Elliott White. In Two Minds about Usability? Rationality and Intuition in Usability Evaluations. Pedro Campos; Nicholas Graham; Joaquim Jorge; Nuno Nunes; Philippe Palanque; Marco Winckler. 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT), Sep 2011, Lisbon, Portugal. Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, LNCS-6949 (Part IV), pp.544-547, 2011, Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2011. 〈10.1007/978-3-642-23768-3_78〉. 〈hal-01596982〉
