Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

Mind the Gap! Comparing Retrospective and Concurrent Ratings of Emotion in User Experience Evaluation

Abstract : User experience (UX) is typically measured retrospectively through subjective questionnaire ratings, yet we know little of how well these retrospective ratings reflect concurrent experiences of an entire event. UX entails a broad range of dimensions of which human emotion is considered to be crucial. This paper presents an empirical study of the discrepancy between concurrent and retrospective ratings of emotions. We induced two experimental conditions of varying pleasantness. Findings show the existence of a significant discrepancy between retrospective and concurrent ratings of emotions. In the most unpleasant condition we found retrospective ratings to be significantly overestimated compared to concurrent ratings. In the most pleasant condition we found retrospective ratings to correlate with the highest and final peaks of emotional arousal. This indicates that we cannot always rely on typical retrospective UX assessments to reflect concurrent experiences. Consequently, we discuss alternative methods of assessing UX, which have considerable implications for practice.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [28 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01599632
Contributor : Hal Ifip <>
Submitted on : Monday, October 2, 2017 - 1:12:18 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, April 24, 2018 - 4:16:53 PM

File

346937_1_En_17_Chapter.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Licence


Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Identifiers

Citation

Anders Bruun, Simon Ahm. Mind the Gap! Comparing Retrospective and Concurrent Ratings of Emotion in User Experience Evaluation. 15th Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT), Sep 2015, Bamberg, Germany. pp.237-254, ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-22701-6_17⟩. ⟨hal-01599632⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

170

Files downloads

374