An Empirical Study of the Effects of Three Think-Aloud Protocols on Identification of Usability Problems

Abstract : Think-aloud is a de facto standard in user-based usability evaluation to verbalize what a user is experiencing. Despite its qualities, it has been argued that thinking aloud affects the task solving process. This paper reports from an empirical study of the effect of three think-aloud protocols on the identified usability problems. The three protocols were traditional, active listening and coaching. The study involved 43 test subjects distributed on the three think-aloud conditions and a silent control condition in a between-subject design. The results show that the three think-aloud protocols facilitated identification of the double number of usability problems compared to the silent condition, while the problems identified by the three think-aloud protocol were comparable. Our results do not support the common emphasis on the Coaching protocol, while we have seen that the Traditional protocol performs surprisingly well.
Document type :
Conference papers
Liste complète des métadonnées

Cited literature [24 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01599881
Contributor : Hal Ifip <>
Submitted on : Monday, October 2, 2017 - 3:42:09 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, April 24, 2018 - 4:16:53 PM

File

346942_1_En_14_Chapter.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Licence


Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Identifiers

Citation

Anders Bruun, Jan Stage. An Empirical Study of the Effects of Three Think-Aloud Protocols on Identification of Usability Problems. 15th Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT), Sep 2015, Bamberg, Germany. pp.159-176, ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-22668-2_14⟩. ⟨hal-01599881⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

37

Files downloads

80