R. Bendraou, J. Jezequel, M. Gervais, and X. Blanc, A Comparison of Six UML-Based Languages for Software Process Modeling, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.36, issue.5, pp.662-675, 2010.
DOI : 10.1109/TSE.2009.85
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00477520

S. Brinkkemper, Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools, Information and Software Technology, vol.38, issue.4, pp.275-280, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0950-5849(95)01059-9

G. Brusa, M. L. Caliusco, and O. Chiotti, Towards ontological engineering: a process for building a domain ontology from scratch in public administration, Expert Systems, vol.11, issue.(2, pp.484-503, 2008.
DOI : 10.1109/5254.683180

E. Union, EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26EC on the re-use of public sector information (2013), pp.32013-32050, 2003.

C. Gonzalez-perez, T. Mcbride, and B. Henderson-sellers, A Metamodel for Assessable Software Development Methodologies, Software Quality Journal, vol.7, issue.2, pp.195-214, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s11219-005-6217-7

. Government-of-flanders-in and . Belgium, Open Data Handbook (Open Data Handleiding) (2016). https://overheid.vlaanderen.be/sites

B. Henderson-sellers, Standards harmonization: theory and practice. Software and Systems Modeling, pp.153-161, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/s10270-011-0213-0

M. Janssen, Y. Charalabidis, and A. Zuiderwijk, Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government, Information Systems Management, vol.28, issue.3, pp.258-268, 2012.
DOI : 10.1080/10580530.2010.493846

P. Loucopoulos and W. M. Kadir, BROOD, Journal of Database Management, vol.19, issue.1, pp.41-73, 2008.
DOI : 10.4018/jdm.2008010103

T. Mart?nez-ruiz, F. Garc?a, M. Piattini, and J. Münch, Modelling software process variability: an empirical study, IET Software, vol.5, issue.2, pp.172-187, 2011.
DOI : 10.1049/iet-sen.2010.0020

P. Moraitis and N. Spanoudakis, THE GAIA2JADE PROCESS FOR MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT, Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol.20, issue.2-4, pp.251-273, 2006.
DOI : 10.1145/958961.958963

M. Ne?aský, D. Chlapek, J. Klímek, J. Ku?era, A. Maurino et al., Deliverable D5.1: Methodology for publishing datasets as open data, 2014.

M. Ne?aský, D. Chlapek, J. Klímek, J. Ku?era, A. Maurino et al., Deliverable D5.1: Methodology for publishing datasets as open data http://www.comsode.eu/wp- content/uploads/Annex2_D5.1- Methodology_Master_Spreadsheet.xlsx 18 Object Management Group: Software and Systems Process Engineering Meta-Model Specification, version 2 Open Knowledge: How to Open Up Data? http://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/how-to-open-up-data/ 20. Open Knowledge: Open Data Handbook, Solutions Bank Open Knowledge: What is Open Data, Method- ology Master Spreadsheet, vol.23, issue.0, 2008.

O. M. Rodríguez-elias, A. I. Martínez-garcía, A. Vizcaíno, J. Favela, and M. Piattini, MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF KNOWLEDGE FLOWS IN SOFTWARE PROCESSES THROUGH THE EXTENSION OF THE SOFTWARE PROCESS ENGINEERING METAMODEL, International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, vol.5, issue.02, pp.185-211, 2009.
DOI : 10.1002/smr.220

J. Saldaña-ramos, A. Sanz-esteban, J. García-guzmán, and A. Amescua, Design of a competence model for testing teams, IET Software, vol.6, issue.5, pp.405-415, 2012.
DOI : 10.1049/iet-sen.2011.0182

. Share, 0: Guides to Implementation of the (Revised) PSI Directive (2016). https

. Socrata, Open Data Field Guide (2016). https://socrata.com/open-data- field-guide

B. Ubaldi, Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, 2013.
DOI : 10.1787/5k46bj4f03s7-en

A. Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen, S. Choenni, and R. Meijer, Design Principles for Improving the Process of Publishing Open data. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, pp.185-204, 2014.