Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.158, issue.3, pp.662-677, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00369-2
The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview. Sustainability 2013, pp.2589-26082589, 2013. ,
Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis: An insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the Northern Mediterranean, Land Use Policy, vol.24, issue.3, pp.546-561, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.02.005
Modeling the bio-refinery industry in rural areas: A participatory approach for policy options comparison, Ecological Economics, vol.72, pp.18-27, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.010
Puzzling stakeholder views for long-term planning in the bio-economy: A back-casting application, Futures, vol.76, pp.42-54, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.futures.2015.04.002
Governance reform under real world conditions. Citizens, stakeholders, and voice: The International bank for Reconstruction and Development, 2008. ,
Improving innovation performance through environmental practices in the fashion industry: the moderating effect of internationalisation and the influence of collaboration, Production Planning & Control, vol.87, issue.9, pp.1-12, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2011.09.012
Sustainability approaches within the fashion industry: the supplier perspective, Supply Chain Forum, An International Journal, vol.17, issue.2, pp.95-108, 2016. ,
Alla ricerca del valore della filiera vitivinicola: verso la formulazione di un modello di analisi, pp.21-43, 2009. ,
Employing social accounting matrix multipliers to profile the bioeconomy in the EU member states: is there a structural pattern?, Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, vol.24, issue.1, pp.913-926, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1080/00220387708421663
The Bio-Economy Input-Output Model: Development and Uses www.nuigalway.ie/semru, 2015. ,
An Economic Impact Analysis of the U.S. Biobased Products Industry: A Report to the Congress of the United States of America. A Joint Publication of the Duke Center for Sustainability & Commerce and the Supply Chain Resource Cooperative, 2015. ,
The Living Lab methodology for complex environments: Insights from the thermal refurbishment of a historical district in the city, Energy Res Soc Sci, 2017. ,
Introducing Living Lab's Method as Knowledge Transfer from one Socio-Institutional Context to another: Evidence from Helsinki-Tallinn Cross- Border Region, Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol.16, issue.8, pp.1089-1101, 2010. ,
LIVING LAB: user???driven innovation for sustainability, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol.13, issue.2, pp.106-118, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1177/1469540505053090
From ???living lab??? to strategic action field: Bringing together energy, mobility, and Information Technology in Germany, Energy Research & Social Science, vol.27, pp.25-35, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.003
Framing the collaborative economy ???Voices of contestation, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol.23, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.002
Environmental Repercussion and the economic structure: an input output approach In The review of Economics and Statistcs, pp.263-271 ,
Living labs and open innovation: Roles and applicability. The Electronic Journal of Virtual Organizations and Networks (EJov, pp.22-46, 2008. ,
Exploring differences between central located test and home use test in a living lab context, International Journal of Consumer Studies, vol.39, pp.230-238, 2015. ,