e-Learning and the Science of Instruction, pp.10-1002, 2016. ,
Invisible disability LEA's communication series. Handbook of communication and people with disabilities: Research and application, pp.405-421, 2000. ,
Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, pp.295-31210, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
A practical reader in universal design for learning, 2006. ,
Environmental Support: An Integrative Framework, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol.6, issue.4, pp.589-61310, 1518. ,
DOI : 10.1207/s15516709cog1801_3
Ability-Based Design, ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, vol.3, issue.3, pp.1-27, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1145/1952383.1952384
URL : https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/8667394/ability_based_design.pdf?sequence=1
Computers and people with disabilities, Extra-ordinary human-computer interaction, pp.19-43, 1995. ,
Strategies for improving the level of accessibility in the design of MOOC-based learning services, 2016 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE), 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1109/SIIE.2016.7751841
Research challenges in accessible MOOCs: a systematic literature review 2008? 2016. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2017. ,
Accessibility of MOOCs. Computers Helping People with Special Needs, pp.141-144, 2014. ,
Accessibility assessment of MOOC platforms in Spanish: UNED COMA, COLMENIA and Miriada X. 2014 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE), 2014. ,
Accessible Lifelong Learning at Higher Education: Outcomes and Lessons Learned at two Different Pilot Sites in the EU4ALL Project, JUCS - Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol.18, issue.1, p.10, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.3217/jucs-018-01-0062
Adaptive content presentation extension for open edX. Enhancing MOOCs accessibility for users with disabilities. ACHI 2015, pp.181-183, 2015. ,
SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, pp.4-7, 1996. ,
Conducting Online Surveys, Quality and Quantity, vol.15, issue.3, pp.435-456, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.4135/9781446218891.n10
Toward A Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol.29, issue.08, pp.271-36010, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2
Relating motivation to information and communication technology acceptance: Self-determination theory perspective, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.51, pp.418-428, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.021
Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.24, issue.4, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.001
Self determination-based design to achieve acceptance of assisted living technologies for older adults, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.65, pp.508-521, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.042
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01351332
An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol.2, issue.2, pp.574-59410, 1080. ,
DOI : 10.1207/S15327590IJHC143&4_11
Closing global achievement gaps in MOOCs, Science, vol.104, issue.6322, pp.251-252, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.1037/a0030478
The role of emotional intelligence in predicting students??? academic achievement in distance education system, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol.2, issue.2, pp.1158-1163, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.164
What are the Expectations of Disabled Learners when Participating in a MOOC?, Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, L@S '17, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.5334/jime.al