Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Multi atlas-based attenuation correction for brain FDG- PET imaging using a TOF-PET/MR scanner: Comparison with clinical single atlas- and CT-based attenuation correction

Abstract : In this work, we assessed the feasibility of attenuation correction (AC) based on a multi-atlas–based method (m-Atlas) by comparing it with a clinical AC method (single-atlas–based method [s-Atlas]), on a time-of-flight (TOF) PET/MRI scanner. Methods: We enrolled 15 patients. The median patient age was 59 y (age range, 31–80). All patients underwent clinically indicated whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging, restaging, or follow-up of malignant disease. All patients volunteered for an additional PET/MRI scan of the head (no additional tracer being injected). For each patient, 3 AC maps were generated. Both s-Atlas and m-Atlas AC maps were generated from the same patient-specific LAVA-Flex T1-weighted images being acquired by default on the PET/MRI scanner during the first 18 s of the PET scan. An s-Atlas AC map was extracted by the PET/MRI scanner, and an m-Atlas AC map was created using a Web service tool that automatically generates m-Atlas pseudo-CT images. For comparison, the AC map generated by PET/CT was registered and used as a gold standard. PET images were reconstructed from raw data on the TOF PET/MRI scanner using each AC map. All PET images were normalized to the SPM5 PET template, and 18F-FDG accumulation was quantified in 67 volumes of interest (VOIs; automated anatomic labeling atlas). Relative (%diff) and absolute differences (\textbar%diff\textbar) between images based on each atlas AC and CT-AC were calculated. 18F-FDG uptake in all VOIs and generalized merged VOIs were compared using the paired t test and Bland–Altman test. Results: The range of error on m-Atlas in all 1,005 VOIs was −4.99% to 4.09%. The \textbar%diff\textbar on the m-Atlas was improved by about 20% compared with s-Atlas (s-Atlas vs. m-Atlas: 1.49% ± 1.06% vs. 1.21% ± 0.89%, P \textless 0.01). In generalized VOIs, %diff on m-Atlas in the temporal lobe and cerebellum was significantly smaller (s-Atlas vs. m-Atlas: temporal lobe, 1.49% ± 1.37% vs. −0.37% ± 1.41%, P \textless 0.01; cerebellum, 1.55% ± 1.97% vs. −1.15% ± 1.72%, P \textless 0.01). Conclusion: The errors introduced using either s-Atlas or m-Atlas did not exceed 5% in any brain region investigated. When compared with the clinical s-Atlas, m-Atlas is more accurate, especially in regions close to the skull base.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01827202
Contributor : Ninon Burgos <>
Submitted on : Sunday, July 1, 2018 - 10:42:34 PM
Last modification on : Friday, December 4, 2020 - 2:30:01 PM

Links full text

Identifiers

Citation

Tetsuro Sekine, Ninon Burgos, Geoffrey Warnock, Martin Huellner, Alfred Buck, et al.. Multi atlas-based attenuation correction for brain FDG- PET imaging using a TOF-PET/MR scanner: Comparison with clinical single atlas- and CT-based attenuation correction. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2016, 57 (8), pp.1258--1264. ⟨10.2967/jnumed.115.169045⟩. ⟨hal-01827202⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

58