R. Morabito, J. Kjällman, and M. Komu, Hypervisors vs. lightweight virtualization: a performance comparison, Cloud Engineering (IC2E), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, pp.386-393, 2015.

W. Felter, A. Ferreira, R. Rajamony, and J. Rubio, An updated performance comparison of virtual machines and linux containers, Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS), 2015 IEEE International Symposium On, pp.171-172, 2015.

P. Sharma, L. Chaufournier, P. J. Shenoy, and Y. Tay, Containers and virtual machines at scale: A comparative study, 2016.

A. Sonone, A. Soni, S. Nathan, and U. Bellur, On exploiting page sharing in a virtualised environmentan empirical study of virtualization versus lightweight containers, IEEE 8th International Conference on, pp.49-56, 2015.

B. Xavier, T. Ferreto, and L. Jersak, Time provisioning evaluation of kvm, docker and unikernels in a cloud platform, Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid), pp.277-280, 2016.

H. Wu, S. Ren, G. Garzoglio, S. Timm, G. Bernabeu et al., A reference model for virtual machine launching overhead, IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol.4, issue.3, pp.250-264, 2016.

T. L. Nguyen and A. Lèbre, Virtual machine boot time model, Parallel, Distributed and Network-based Processing, pp.430-437, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01586932

A. Kivity, Y. Kamay, D. Laor, U. Lublin, and A. Liguori, kvm: the linux virtual machine monitor, Proceedings of the Linux symposium, vol.1, pp.225-230, 2007.

D. Merkel, Docker: lightweight linux containers for consistent development and deployment, Linux Journal, vol.2014, issue.239, 2014.

J. Mambretti, J. Chen, and F. Yeh, Next generation clouds, the chameleon cloud testbed, and software defined networking (sdn), Cloud Computing Research and Innovation (ICCCRI), 2015 International Conference on, pp.73-79, 2015.

D. Balouek, A. Carpen-amarie, G. Charrier, F. Desprez, E. Jeannot et al., Adding virtualization capabilities to the Grid'5000 testbed, Cloud Computing and Services Science, ser. Communications in Computer and Information Science, I. Ivanov, M. Sinderen, vol.367, pp.3-20, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00946971

M. E. , Using the execo toolbox to perform automatic and reproducible cloud experiments, 1st International Workshop on UsiNg and building ClOud Testbeds (UNICO, collocated with IEEE CloudCom, 2013.

N. Capit, G. D. Costa, Y. Georgiou, G. Huard, C. Martin et al., A batch scheduler with high level components, IEEE International Symposium on, vol.2, pp.776-783, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00005106

E. Jeanvoine, L. Sarzyniec, and L. Nussbaum, Kadeploy3: Efficient and scalable operating system provisioning for clusters, USENIX; login, vol.38, pp.38-44, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00909111

B. Claudel, G. Huard, and O. Richard, Taktuk, adaptive deployment of remote executions, Proceedings of the 18th ACM international symposium on High performance distributed computing, pp.91-100, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00788923

R. Russell, virtio: towards a de-facto standard for virtual i/o devices, ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, vol.42, issue.5, pp.95-103, 2008.

, Description of cache modes

K. Razavi and T. Kielmann, Scalable virtual machine deployment using vm image caches, Proceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, p.65, 2013.

Z. Zhang, D. Li, and K. Wu, Large-scale virtual machines provisioning in clouds: challenges and approaches, Frontiers of Computer Science, vol.10, issue.1, pp.2-18, 2016.

B. Nicolae, F. Cappello, and G. Antoniu, Optimizing multi-deployment on clouds by means of self-adaptive prefetching, European Conference on Parallel Processing, pp.503-513, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00594406

A. Garcia, Improving the performance of the qcow2 format, 2017.

. Available,