L. Bloomfield, , 1933.

X. Chen, K. Gerdes, and S. Kahane, Submitted. Typometrics: From Implicational to Quantitative Universals in Word Order Typology

G. Cinque, Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective, 1999.

M. De-marneffe, B. Maccartney, D. Christopher, and . Manning, Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses, Proceedings of LREC, 2006.

R. Futrell, K. Mahowald, and E. Gibson, Large-scale evidence of dependency length, 2015.

, Although the advances in neural parsers trained on sufficient data probably will ultimately wipe out any differences (because the parser can independently learn the UD-SUD transformation rules)

, On the contrary, SUD is an alternative encoding of UD information. minimization in 37 languages, This aspect distinguishes SUD from Enhanced UD, vol.112, pp.10336-10341

K. Gerdes and S. Kahane, Defining dependencies (and constituents), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Dependency Linguistics, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01505899

K. Gerdes and S. Kahane, Dependency annotation choices: Assessing theoretical and practical issues of universal dependencies, Proceedings of the 10th Linguistic Annotation Workshop held in conjunction with ACL 2016, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01509118

T. Groß, Catenae in morphology, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Dependency Linguistics, 2011.

G. Bonfante, B. Guillaume, and G. Perrier, Application of Graph Rewriting to Natural Language Processing, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01814386

J. Haji?, E. Haji?ová, M. Mikulová, and J. Mírovský, Prague Dependency Treebank. Handbook of Linguistic Annotation, pp.555-594, 2017.

R. Jackendoff, X-bar syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 2, 1977.

A. Kirilin and Y. Versley, What is hard in Universal Dependency Parsing, Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Statistical Parsing of Morphologically Rich Languages, 2015.

H. Liu, Dependency distance as a metric of language comprehension difficulty, Journal of Cognitive Science, vol.9, issue.2, pp.159-191, 2008.

M. P. Marcus, M. A. Marcinkiewicz, and B. Santorini, Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank, Computational linguistics, vol.19, pp.313-330, 1993.

I. Mel and &. ?uk, Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice, 1988.

I. Rehbein and J. Steen, Universal Dependencies are hard to parse-or are they?, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Dependency Linguistics, 2017.

A. Ivan and . Sag, Coordination and underspecification, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on HPSG, 2003.

A. Savary, PARSEME-PARSing and Multiword Expressions within a European multilingual network, 7th Language & Technology Conference: Human Language Technologies as a Challenge for Computer Science and Linguistics, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01223349

S. Schuster and C. D. Manning, Enhanced English Universal Dependencies: An Improved Representation for Natural Language Understanding Tasks, Proceedings of LREC, 2016.

R. Schwartz, O. Abend, and A. Rappoport, Learnability-based syntactic annotation design, Proceedings of COLING 24, pp.2405-2422, 2012.

N. Silveira and C. Manning, Does Universal Dependencies need a parsing representation? An investigation of English, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Dependency Linguistics, 2015.

R. D. Van-valin, A typology of syntactic relations in clause linkage, Annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, vol.10, pp.542-558, 1984.