R. Development-core and . Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014.

R. E. Rodriguez, J. M. Debernardi, and J. F. Palatnik, Morphogenesis of simple leaves: regulation of leaf size and shape, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Developmental Biology, vol.3, pp.41-57, 2014.

A. Roeder, V. Chickarmane, A. Cunha, B. Obara, B. S. Manjunath et al., , 2010.

, Variability in the control of cell division underlies sepal epidermal patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana, PLoS Biology, vol.8, p.1000367

B. Rymen, F. Fiorani, F. Kartal, K. Vandepoele, D. Inzé et al., Cold nights impair leaf growth and cell cycle progression in maize through transcriptional changes of cell cycle genes, Plant Physiology, vol.143, pp.1429-1438, 2007.

R. Sablowski, Coordination of plant cell growth and division: collective control or mutual agreement?, Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol.34, pp.54-60, 2016.

W. Sadok, N. Ph, B. Boussuge, B. Muller, C. Welcker et al., Leaf growth rate per unit thermal time follows QTL-dependent daily patterns in hundreds of maize lines under naturally fluctuating conditions, Plant Cell and Environment, vol.30, pp.135-146, 2007.

R. Sattler and R. Rutishauser, Partial homology of pinnate leaves and shoots: orientation of leaflet inception, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie, vol.114, pp.61-79, 1992.

D. R. Scholes and K. N. Paige, Plasticity in ploidy: a generalized response to stress, Trends in Plant Science, vol.20, pp.165-175, 2015.

A. Skirycz, K. Vandenbroucke, P. Clauw, K. Maleux, D. Meyer et al., Vuylsteke (this is why the x-axis is broken and soil water content is not quantified by its stable value). Data are shown for the 9 th compound leaf of the first sympodial unit. Each point represents final leaf area (A), mean epidermal cell number per leaf (B) and epidermal cell areas (C). They were calculated by pooling all leaflets of each leaf. Trends (black full lines) of final leaf area (A, 3 < n < 6), final mean epidermal cell number per leaf (B, 3 < n < 6) and final epidermal cell area

, Ploidy level distribution as measured by flow cytometry in a young tomato leaf used as a standard to identify positions of peaks of 2C, Sup. Fig, vol.1

, 2, 1.4 and 1.6 g H 2 O g-1 dry soil) and one severe water deficit treatment (swd). Data are shown for different leaflet positions on the 9 th compound leaf of the first sympodial unit. Trends were calculated for the terminal leaflet (left) and then by pooling data from paired leaflets 2 and 3 (middle) and 4 and 5 (right), according to their organization in symmetric ranks along the rachis (see Figure 2). Trends (black 46 full lines) of final leaflet area, Sup. Fig. 2. Soil water content dose response of leaflet size-related traits in Wva106 plants grown in five different stable soil water contents