, numerous responses were found that corroborate [the] tendency to require simplicity when dealing with modeling non-experts

, syntax highlighting with colors for matching gateway pairs is positively related to novices' model comprehension

, the use of gateway constructs benefits understanding; implicit representation is often misunderstood

, no evidence that syntax highlighting improves experts' performance

, Accuracy of understanding" for visual modeling languages. The referenced claims are: References 1. User requirements notation (URN) language definition, pp.2018-2021, 2008.

J. Aranda, N. A. Ernst, J. Horkoff, and S. M. Easterbrook, A framework for empirical evaluation of model comprehensibility, International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering at ICSE, 2007.

B. Boehm and H. In, Identifying quality-requirement conflicts, IEEE Software, vol.13, issue.2, 1996.
DOI : 10.1109/icre.1996.491448

A. Burattin, M. Kaiser, M. Neurauter, and B. Weber, Eye tracking meets the process of process modeling: A visual analytic approach, Business Process Management Workshops -BPM 2016 International Workshops, 2016.

L. Chung, B. Nixon, and E. Yu, Using non-functional requirements to systematically select among alternatives in architectural design, Proc. 1st Int. Workshop on Architectures for Software Systems, 1994.

L. Chung, B. A. Nixon, E. Yu, and J. Mylopoulos, Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering, 2000.

S. De-kinderen and Q. Ma, Requirements engineering for the design of conceptual modeling languages, Applied Ontology, vol.10, issue.1, 2015.

K. , Comprehension of procedural visual business process models, Business & Information Systems Engineering, vol.59, issue.1, 2017.

K. Figl, J. Mendling, and M. Strembeck, The influence of notational deficiencies on process model comprehension, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol.14, issue.6, 2013.

K. Figl, J. Mendling, M. Strembeck, and J. Recker, On the cognitive effectiveness of routing symbols in process modeling languages, Business Information Systems, 2010.

K. Figl, J. Recker, and J. Mendling, A study on the effects of routing symbol design on process model comprehension, Decision Support Systems, vol.54, issue.2, 2013.

K. Figl and M. Strembeck, Findings from an experiment on flow direction of business process models, Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA), vol.248, 2015.

U. Frank, Domain-specific modeling languages: Requirements analysis and design guidelines, 2013.

N. Genon, P. Heymans, and D. Amyot, Analysing the cognitive effectiveness of the BPMN 2.0 visual notation, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Software Language Engineering, SLE'10, pp.377-396, 2011.

, Bpmn 2.0 by example, version 1.0 (non-normative, 2010.

J. Gulden and H. A. Reijers, Toward advanced visualization techniques for conceptual modeling, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR, 2015.

J. Gulden, D. Linden, and B. Aysolmaz, Requirements for research on visualizations in information systems engineering, Proceedings of the ENASE Conference, 2016.

, Business process modeling notation 2.0 (BPMN 2.0), 2011.

T. Kummer, J. Recker, and J. Mendling, Enhancing understandability of process models through cultural-dependent color adjustments, Decis. Support Syst, vol.87, 2016.

H. Leopold, J. Mendling, and O. Gunther, Learning from quality issues of BPMN models from industry, IEEE Software, vol.33, issue.4, 2016.

J. Mendling, H. A. Reijers, and W. M. Van-der-aalst, Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG), Inf. Softw. Technol, vol.52, issue.2, 2010.

D. L. Moody, The "physics" of notations: Toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.35, issue.6, pp.11-12, 2009.

R. Petrusel, J. Mendling, and H. A. Reijers, Task-specific visual cues for improving process model understanding. Information and Software Technology, vol.79, 2016.

J. Recker, Empirical investigation of the usefulness of gateway constructs in process models, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.22, issue.6, 2013.

H. A. Reijers, T. Freytag, J. Mendling, and A. Eckleder, Syntax highlighting in business process models, Decis. Support Syst, vol.51, issue.3, 2011.

M. Das-graças-da-silva-teixeira, G. K. Quirino, F. Gailly, R. De-almeida-falbo, G. Guizzardi et al., PoN-S : a systematic approach for applying the Physics of Notation (PoN), Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol.248, 2016.

D. Linden, I. Hadar, and A. Zamansky, On the requirement from practice for meaningful variability in visual notation, Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling -18th International Conference, BPMDS 2017, 22nd International Conference, 2017.

D. Linden, I. Hadar, and A. Zamansky, What practitioners really want: requirements for visual notations in conceptual modeling. Software & Systems Modeling, vol.2, 2018.

D. Linden, A. Zamansky, and I. Hadar, How cognitively effective is a visual notation? On the inherent difficulty of operationalizing the physics of notations, Enterprise, BusinessProcess and Information Systems Modeling, 2016.

D. Linden, A. Zamansky, and I. Hadar, A framework for improving the verifiability of visual notation design grounded in the physics of notations, 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), 2017.