Automatic Extraction and Ranking of Systems of Contradictions Out of a Design of Experiments - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Conference Papers Year : 2018

Automatic Extraction and Ranking of Systems of Contradictions Out of a Design of Experiments

(1) , (1) , (1)
1

Abstract

This paper shows to what extent data used in design optimization process and TRIZ based models of contradictions can benefit from each other. New design often starts by optimizing existing systems by experimental and numerical means. This approach requires building a model linking on the one hand, a set of Action Parameters; and on the other hand, Evaluation Parameters measuring the quality of a solution. When none of the solutions satisfy the objectives, a redesign of the system is required. Our hypothesis in this paper is that the analysis of experimental or simulation data, can be used as input to automatically extract systems of contradictions, and moreover that it can help to make a ranking of these systems of contradictions.In the article 3 ways to extract, out of Design of Experiments, and to prioritize Generalized Systems of Contradictions will be presented. These methods will be illustrated throughout a case study related to a cutting process.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
474537_1_En_23_Chapter.pdf (1.04 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)

Dates and versions

hal-02279775 , version 1 (05-09-2019)

Licence

Attribution - CC BY 4.0

Identifiers

Cite

Hicham Chibane, Sébastien Dubois, Roland De Guio. Automatic Extraction and Ranking of Systems of Contradictions Out of a Design of Experiments. 18th TRIZ Future Conference (TFC), Oct 2018, Strasbourg, France. pp.276-289, ⟨10.1007/978-3-030-02456-7_23⟩. ⟨hal-02279775⟩
27 View
35 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More